Outlet profile

Critical Threats

U.S. right (neoconservative / hawkish foreign policy)

Owned byOperated by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank; run in close partnership with the Institute for the Study of War (ISW)

FundingDonations from individuals, foundations, and corporations channeled through AEI; the project states it takes no U.S. or foreign government money, though AEI itself has faced scrutiny over defense-industry and corporate donor ties

On the administrationmixed

Background

Critical Threats was launched in 2009 by Frederick W. Kagan at AEI to track threats from Iran, al-Qaeda, and later ISIS, growing out of the same Kagan-family network of analysts (including Kimberly Kagan, Frederick's spouse) who helped shape the Iraq War 'surge' strategy. It has no separate legal or nonprofit status from AEI, operating as an in-house project staffed by AEI fellows and researchers. Since 2022 it has partnered closely with the Institute for the Study of War, co-publishing the widely cited daily Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments and the Iran Update, which are used by journalists, officials, and analysts tracking those conflicts. The project has drawn criticism from foreign-policy critics who view it as part of a neoconservative, pro-intervention ecosystem that helped build the case for the Iraq War and consistently advocates for sustained or expanded U.S. military engagement abroad. Its analysts, particularly Frederick Kagan, have been influential media commentators on Ukraine and Iran policy across Democratic and Republican administrations, taking hawkish positions that sometimes align with and sometimes cut against the sitting president's approach. Under the Biden administration, Critical Threats regularly pushed for more aggressive support to Ukraine and firmer action against Iran-backed groups. Under the second Trump administration, its output has continued in the same vein: generally welcoming pressure campaigns against Iran and its proxies, but voicing skepticism or concern when the administration has pursued rapid diplomatic deals, troop drawdowns, or ceasefires that CTP analysts argue could benefit Russia or Iran.

Sources

Profile compiled 2026-09-26; refreshed when ownership, funding, or the administration changes.

← Back to track record