Outlet profile

Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

U.S. non-interventionist, transpartisan

Owned byIndependent nonprofit think tank; no single owner. Governed by a board chaired by Stephen B. Heintz, with Lora Lumpe as CEO and Trita Parsi as executive vice president.

FundingPhilanthropic donations. Launched in 2019 with $500,000 each from George Soros's Open Society Foundations and the Charles Koch Institute, plus roughly $800,000 from other donors. Ongoing funders include the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Ploughshares Fund, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Colombe Foundation, and the Stand Together Trust (Koch network), among others.

On the administrationmixed

Background

The Quincy Institute was incorporated in late 2019 and named after President John Quincy Adams, invoking his 1821 warning against America going abroad 'in search of monsters to destroy.' It was co-founded by historian and retired Army colonel Andrew Bacevich, Iran policy scholar Trita Parsi, and several other foreign policy researchers with the explicit mission of pulling U.S. foreign policy away from 'endless war' and toward vigorous diplomacy. Its unusual seed funding — equal $500,000 contributions from left-of-center donor George Soros and libertarian Charles Koch — was designed to signal a transpartisan, restraint-first identity that could attract voices from both ends of the political spectrum. The institute publishes an online magazine, Responsible Statecraft, which Media Bias/Fact Check rates as left-center in practice due to its anti-interventionist framing and selective sourcing, even as the institute itself is rated least-biased. Critics from the right, including Senator Tom Cotton, have alleged the organization harbors anti-Israel bias, while analysts from the center-left have questioned whether its donor ties skew coverage toward accommodation of Iran. The institute faced internal fracturing over its Ukraine coverage after Russia's 2022 invasion, with some contributors arguing its restraint framework led to insufficient condemnation of Russian aggression. Despite those tensions, it has maintained a consistent editorial line opposing U.S. military escalation, arms transfers, and what it calls 'foreign policy by force,' and it regularly publishes scholars from across the realist and progressive foreign policy traditions.

Sources

Profile compiled 2026-07-15; refreshed when ownership, funding, or the administration changes.

← Back to track record