ICE Plans 1,400-Bed Detention Center at Closed Rivers Prison in Hertford County, N.C.
Internal documents describe a plan to reopen the shuttered Rivers Correctional Institution as an ICE detention site by year's end; ICE says it has no new facilities to announce, and Gov. Josh Stein says he opposes it.
A Building That Doesn't Exist Yet, According to the Agency Building It
Internal federal documents describe a plan to reopen a shuttered prison in rural North Carolina as a 1,400-bed immigration detention center by the end of 2026[4]. An ICE spokesperson, asked about it, said the agency has "no new detention centers to announce at this time"[4]. In the same breath, that spokesperson said ICE "is actively working to expand detention space"[4]. Both statements are true. Neither one confirms or denies the plan reported by The New York Times.
That gap between what the paperwork says and what the agency will say out loud is the story right now. No signed contract has been made public[1][3]. Until one surfaces, everything downstream — the jobs, the opposition, the building's troubled history — is being argued in advance of the facts that would actually settle it.
The Building, the Beds, and the Empty Years Between
The site is the former Rivers Correctional Institution in Winton, a small town in Hertford County near the Virginia border. GEO Group, a publicly traded private prison company, built and ran it starting in 2001[9]. It closed in 2021, after the Federal Bureau of Prisons ended its contract as part of a Biden administration push to stop using private prisons[5][9]. About 300 people lost their jobs when it shut down[4].
Since then the building has sat empty. The new plan would fill it with roughly 1,400 immigration detainees, run again by GEO Group, and operating by the end of this year[1][2]. If it happens, it would be the first dedicated ICE detention center in North Carolina, and one of the largest on the East Coast[1][2].
Right now, North Carolina has none. People ICE arrests in the state are driven to facilities farther south, in states like Georgia and Alabama[4]. ICE and supporters of the plan call this a "detention desert"[4]. That term is doing real work, and it's worth unpacking, because it's the clearest window into why ICE wants this specific building.
Why an Empty Prison in North Carolina Matters to a National Number
Detention capacity is the throttle on how many arrests ICE can actually carry out. If ICE arrests someone who is ordered removed from the country, the agency has to hold that person somewhere until a flight leaves. No beds means no place to hold them, which means arrests can't keep rising no matter how many agents are in the field.
Congress funded a major expansion of that capacity in a 2025 budget law. The Department of Homeland Security says the law paid for 80,000 new beds and pushed the average daily population toward 100,000[10]. Fox News separately reported total capacity rising to 92,600 beds through a $38.3 billion expansion[11]. Those two numbers don't match exactly, and neither has been independently audited — but both point the same direction: more space, faster.
An internal ICE memo dated February 13, 2026 set a deadline. It called for new mega-centers to be operational by November 30, 2026[8][18]. Reopening an already-built prison is faster than building one from scratch, and a former ICE official who served under both parties has said the agency looks for places seen as receptive, with no state law blocking it[4]. Hertford County — rural, with few employers and a prison already sitting idle — fits that description regardless of which party runs the state government.
A Company That Profits When the Building Is Full, and a Governor Who Can't Stop It
GEO Group's finances explain the other half of the pressure. The company posted a record $254 million profit in 2025, a roughly 700% jump from the year before, driven by a mix of asset sales and new ICE contracts[12]. It added about $520 million in new annualized contract revenue last year and roughly 6,000 new ICE beds across four sites[12]. An empty, fully built 1,400-bed prison earns the company nothing. Filling it turns a dead asset into revenue.
Governor Josh Stein opposes the plan, but his opposition runs into a hard legal wall. "The planned ICE detention center in Winton is not state-owned, and I did not approve this transaction," he said. "Like many other North Carolinians, I do not want it in our state. ICE and Border Patrol have not earned our trust"[1][2]. He cited a Human Rights Watch count of at least 22 deaths in ICE custody so far in 2026 as part of that distrust[1].
Here's the mechanism behind why his statement is a position, not a veto: the prison is private property, and the contract, if signed, would be a federal one. States issue permits for new construction and approve sales of state land — neither applies here, because the building already exists, is already zoned as a prison, and belongs to GEO Group, not North Carolina. That leaves Stein with public statements, not authority. Opponents' real leverage runs through other channels: publicity, state inspection rules, and open-records lawsuits, which the ACLU of North Carolina has already used to force ICE to disclose sites it's considering[14].
The Same 2016 Report, Read Two Different Ways
The deepest dispute isn't whether ICE needs the beds. It's what this particular building's history predicts about what happens if it reopens. A 2016 Justice Department inspector general review compared Rivers to other federal contract prisons and found it had the highest rates of contraband finds, inmate assaults on staff, and uses of force[7][9]. NC Newsline summarized that record with a headline calling Rivers "a lawless place"[7] — the outlet's own phrase, not a direct quote from the Justice Department itself.
Opponents treat that history as a forecast: the same building, the same operator, likely the same outcomes. GEO Group and federal officials counter that a new contract would run under different rules and different oversight than the one in place a decade ago[13]. Neither side has the missing piece that would actually resolve it — the terms of a new contract, which don't yet exist publicly. Oversight, medical staffing, and inspection rights are exactly the kind of details a signed contract would spell out, and none of that is on the record yet[1][3].
Locally, the county is genuinely split, not united against the plan. County Commissioner Leroy Douglas has said many residents who lost jobs when Rivers closed want it reopened[4]. But most speakers at a county commissioners' meeting opposed it, and news of the plan drew the first protests ever held in nearby Ahoskie, in March 2026[4][5]. Hertford County's government says it has gotten no formal notice from Washington and has no authority over the decision either way[5].
What the Coverage Leaves Out, Depending on Where You Look
Coverage of this story splits less on facts than on what gets left out. Right-leaning outlets like Fox News have covered the national detention buildout — the 92,600-bed, $38.3 billion figure — without mentioning Winton specifically, or the deaths in custody, or the 2016 inspection findings[11]. Left-leaning outlets, including NC Newsline and the Brennan Center, tend to lead with GEO Group's profits and the prison's history before addressing ICE's stated logistical case[7][12][21]. NPR's headline states "ICE to open" the facility as settled fact, even though its own story includes no ICE comment at all — the agency simply didn't respond to it[1]. That confirmation gap only becomes visible to a reader who also sees the Times reporting, where ICE's actual, noncommittal statement appears[4].
A search for coverage outside the United States turned up almost nothing. For now, this is being treated as a domestic land-use and jobs story, not an international human-rights one — even though Stein's own objection leaned on a global human-rights group's casualty count[1].
What happens next depends on paperwork nobody outside a small circle has seen yet. If a contract gets signed and published, it will settle questions that speeches and press statements can't: staffing levels, payment terms, and whether the county's 300 jobs actually come back. Until then, both sides are reading the same empty building and the same 2016 report, and arriving at opposite conclusions about what comes next.
Summary
Internal federal documents obtained by The New York Times describe a plan by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to reopen the closed Rivers Correctional Institution in Winton, North Carolina, as an immigration detention center by the end of 2026[4]. The site sits in rural Hertford County, near the Virginia border. The plan calls for about 1,400 beds, which would make it one of the largest ICE detention facilities on the East Coast and the first dedicated ICE detention center in North Carolina[1][2]. The prison is privately owned by The GEO Group, which would run it[1].
ICE has not confirmed the plan. An agency spokesperson said ICE has "no new detention centers to announce at this time," while adding that ICE "is actively working to expand detention space"[4]. Hertford County officials say they have received no formal notice, and that the decision is a federal one outside county control[5].
Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, opposes the facility. "The planned ICE detention center in Winton is not state-owned, and I did not approve this transaction," he wrote. "Like many other North Carolinians, I do not want it in our state. ICE and Border Patrol have not earned our trust"[1][2]. That statement points to the central legal fact: because the prison is private property, the governor has no permit or sale to block. Supporters of the plan say the region is a "detention desert" — people ICE arrests in North Carolina are now driven to facilities in other states, which costs officer hours and money[4].
The deepest genuine dispute is not whether the beds are needed. It is what the site's history predicts. A 2016 Justice Department inspector general review found Rivers had the highest rates among federal contract prisons for contraband finds, inmate assaults on staff, and uses of force[7][9]. Opponents treat that record as a forecast[7]. GEO Group and federal officials treat the past as a different contract, under different rules, with different oversight[13]. No new contract for the site has been made public, so the terms that would settle the question are not yet on the record.
The Event
Internal ICE documents obtained by The New York Times, reported July 23-24, 2026, describe a plan to open a roughly 1,400-bed immigration detention center at the former Rivers Correctional Institution in Winton, Hertford County, North Carolina, by the end of the year[4][2]. The prison, owned and formerly operated by The GEO Group, has been closed since 2021, when its Federal Bureau of Prisons contract expired[9][5]. On July 24, Gov. Josh Stein said publicly that he had not approved the transaction and did not want the facility in the state[1]. An ICE spokesperson said, in comments reported July 23, 2026, that the agency had "no new detention centers to announce at this time" but was "actively working to expand detention space"[4].
Undisputed Facts
- Rivers Correctional Institution opened in 2001 in Winton, North Carolina, and is owned and operated by The GEO Group, a publicly traded private corrections company[9].
- The prison closed in 2021 after its Federal Bureau of Prisons contract expired, following a Biden administration policy of ending federal contracts with private prison operators[5][9].
- The facility employed about 300 people when it closed[4].
- A 2016 Justice Department Office of the Inspector General review found Rivers had the highest rates among federal contract prisons for contraband finds (excluding cell phones), inmate assaults on staff, uses of force, and disciplinary convictions[7][9].
- North Carolina currently has no dedicated ICE detention center; people ICE arrests in the state are generally transported to facilities in states farther south[4].
- An ICE spokesperson said, in comments reported July 23, 2026, that the agency had "no new detention centers to announce at this time" while adding it was "actively working to expand detention space"[4].
- Gov. Josh Stein stated that the site is not state-owned and that he did not approve the transaction[1][2].
- The Hertford County government said it had received no formal notification from federal authorities and that the decision rests with the federal government, not the county board[5].
- More than 200 people rallied at the North Carolina General Assembly earlier in 2026 to oppose reopening the prison as an ICE facility[16].
- The July 2025 budget law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act appropriated tens of billions of dollars for immigration detention; DHS says it funded 80,000 new ICE beds[10][17].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- Beds are the throttle on enforcement
- Immigration arrests cannot outrun the space to hold people. Congress funds ICE partly by detention capacity, measured as average daily population — the average number of people held on a given day. DHS says the 2025 budget law funded 80,000 additional beds and capacity for an average daily population near 100,000[10]. Fox News reports capacity rising to 92,600 beds through a $38.3 billion expansion[11]. Those accountings differ, and neither has been independently audited. Either way, the direction is the same: without beds, arrest totals plateau. That is why ICE wants this building, and why opponents fight the building rather than only the policy.
- A paid-for asset earning nothing
- Rivers is a fully built 1,400-bed prison that has generated no revenue since 2021. GEO Group's economics reward putting it back to work: the company posted a record $254 million profit in 2025 on roughly $520 million in new annualized contract revenue[12]. Reopening an existing prison is also faster than construction, which matters against a stated November 30, 2026 operational deadline in ICE planning documents[8].
- Geography, not politics, picked the county
- The Mid-Atlantic has almost no ICE detention. A former ICE official who served under both parties has said the agency looks for space in places seen as more receptive and where no law forbids it[4]. Hertford County is rural, poor, and lost 300 jobs when the prison closed[4]. That combination — empty prison, weak local economy, no state ban — is what makes a site attractive, regardless of which party runs the state.
- The governor has no lever
- This is the quiet fact under Stein's statement. The prison is private property and the contract is federal, so there is no state permit to deny and no state sale to block. Zoning is local, and the building is already zoned as a prison. A governor's opposition here is a public position, not a veto — which is why the fight moves to publicity, records lawsuits, and inspection authority.
Material realityA 1,400-bed prison stands empty in Winton, North Carolina. It was built for this purpose, it is owned by a company that profits when it is full, and the federal government has money appropriated to fill facilities like it[10][12]. The nearest ICE detention beds are hundreds of miles away, which is a real operational cost to the agency and a real barrier for detainees' families and lawyers today[4]. The building also carries a documented federal record: in 2016 the Justice Department's inspector general found it had the highest rates among federal contract prisons for contraband, inmate assaults on staff, and uses of force[7][9]. Both of those things are true at once. No signed contract for the site has been made public, and ICE has not confirmed the plan[1][3]. So the terms that would actually determine conditions — oversight, medical staffing, inspection rights, whether payment is guaranteed regardless of occupancy — are not yet on the public record. Until they are, both sides are arguing from the same 2016 report and reaching opposite conclusions about what happens next.
Narrative as a weaponFour actors are shaping what you see. ICE and DHS want the story to be about logistics and lawful capacity: a 'detention desert,' wasted officer hours, an empty building put to use — a framing that makes conditions inside the facility someone else's subject. GEO Group wants near-silence; it benefits from being described as a contractor, not a decision-maker, and has not publicly confirmed a deal. Gov. Stein and immigrant-rights groups want the story to be about consent and about this building's specific record, because both are stronger ground than the underlying legal question, where the state has no authority. Local officials in Hertford County want it understood that they were not asked, which is both a genuine grievance and a shield from blame either way. Watch two things as this develops. First, whether a contract is actually signed and published — headlines have run ahead of the confirmed record. Second, whether the 300 jobs are discussed at all, since coverage that omits them is describing only half of what the county is weighing.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asDetention is not optional, it is the machinery of the law. If a person is ordered removed, the government has to be able to hold that person until the flight leaves. Congress funded that in 2025, so building the space is carrying out the law, not stretching it[10][17]. North Carolina and the states around it are a "detention desert" — meaning no nearby facility holds ICE detainees. Officers arresting someone in Raleigh must drive that person hundreds of miles to Georgia, Louisiana, or Alabama. That burns a full day of officer time per trip and, DHS argues, also pulls detainees farther from their own families and lawyers[4]. Reopening a purpose-built, already-standing prison is faster and cheaper than new construction, and avoids the warehouse conversions DHS itself has admitted went badly[10].
WhyHit a detention capacity target set by Congress and the White House on a deadline. An internal ICE memo dated February 13, 2026 laid out mega-centers meant to be operational by November 30, 2026[8][18]. Bed space is the binding limit on how many arrests the agency can sustain — without beds, arrest numbers cannot rise.
Impact on themICE gains its first dedicated East Coast anchor between Virginia and Georgia. It also absorbs the political cost: a sitting governor, a county with no formal notice, and a building carrying a documented federal record of poor conditions[7][1][5].
Frames it asGEO says it is a service provider, not a policymaker: it houses whoever the government sends and is judged on contract compliance. The company points to a fresh contract, current standards, and a fresh inspection regime as the answer to the 2016 findings — a new agreement is not the old one. It also argues an idle, fully built 1,400-bed prison sitting empty in a poor county is a waste no one benefits from[9][12].
WhyRevenue and asset use. GEO reported a company-record $254 million profit in 2025, roughly a 700% jump over 2024, driven by a combination of asset sales and new ICE contracts[12]. It booked about $520 million in new or expanded annualized contract revenue in 2025 and added roughly 6,000 ICE beds across four sites[12]. Rivers is a paid-for building producing nothing; filling it converts a dead asset into cash flow.
Impact on themA 1,400-bed contract would be one of its larger single awards. It also raises the company's political exposure: NPR has reported that a former GEO executive now leads ICE, which critics cite as evidence the relationship is too close[13]. GEO disputes that its contracts are anything other than competitively awarded.
Frames it asThe argument has three parts. First
WhyStein is a Democratic governor in a state with a Republican-controlled legislature that has passed laws requiring sheriffs to cooperate with ICE[1]. He has little legal power here and real political need to be on record. Immigrant-rights groups want to raise the political cost of siting facilities anywhere, one county at a time.
Impact on themPractically limited. Because the prison is private and the contract is federal, the state has no permit to deny and no sale to veto. The main available levers are publicity, state inspection and licensing rules where they apply, and litigation. The ACLU of North Carolina has used Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to force disclosure of which sites ICE is considering[14].
Frames it asThis side is genuinely split, and both halves are strong. Supporters point at 300 lost jobs in a rural county with few employers, plus the tax base and the contractors and suppliers a 1,400-bed facility feeds. County Commissioner Leroy Douglas said many residents who lost jobs when Rivers closed favor reopening it[4]. Opponents — the majority of speakers at a county commissioners' meeting — say the county was never consulted, that recent fatal shootings by ICE agents changed local sentiment, and that a town should not have to trade its name for a payroll[4][5]. News of the plan drew the first protests ever held in nearby Ahoskie, in March 2026[4].
WhyEconomic survival on one side; community standing and safety on the other. Neither camp gets a formal vote, which is itself a grievance.
Impact on themMost directly affected, least legally empowered. The county says it has no authority over the decision and received no formal notice[5]. Whichever way it goes, roughly 300 jobs and the county's public identity are on the table.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.7
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRAL | U.S. center, commercial local | 2 | "ICE plans to open federal immigration detention center in Eastern North Carolina by 2026, says NYT" | Attributes the claim to the originating outlet right in the headline and does not assert it independently. The most cautious framing in the set; its limitation is that it mostly aggregates rather than adding local reporting. |
| The New York Times | U.S. center-left | 3 | "ICE Targets 'Detention Desert' With New Facility in North Carolina" — leads with the agency's own logistical rationale, sourced to internal documents the paper obtained. | The scoop framing is operational rather than moral, which is comparatively restrained. But 'detention desert' is ICE's term, used in the headline without quotation of a named official, and the piece foregrounds resident opposition and the prison's history over any economic case for reopening. |
| NPR | U.S. center-left, publicly and donor funded | 4 | "ICE to open immigration detention center in rural N.C. Gov. Stein says he does 'not want it in our state.'" | The headline states as fact ('ICE to open') what the agency has elsewhere declined to confirm. This story itself contains no ICE comment at all — it notes ICE did not respond to requests for comment — so the confirmation gap is never surfaced in the piece; readers only get it if they also see the NYT reporting. The governor's objection is elevated into the headline itself, while the 300 lost jobs appear as a single line deep in the piece. |
| Fox News | U.S. right | 4 | "ICE ramps up deportation push by boosting capacity to 92,600 beds with $38.3B expansion" — covers the national buildout, not the Winton site. | Frames detention purely as capacity and throughput. Deaths in custody, the inspector general record at contract prisons, and local opposition are absent. The verbs ('ramps up,' 'boosting') carry momentum and competence rather than controversy. |
| Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald | U.S. local, small-town commercial | 5 | Two headlines in sequence: "ICE not wanted in Hertford County" and, later, "RCI reopening not yet confirmed." | The first headline generalizes a meeting's loudest speakers into the county's position, though its own text notes some residents want the jobs back. The second headline is the most factually careful in the whole set. The pair shows how much framing shifts between a meeting story and a status story. |
| NC Newsline | U.S. left, part of the donor-funded States Newsroom network | 7 | "Department of Justice: Rivers Correctional Institution in Hertford County is a lawless place" | The phrase 'a lawless place' is the outlet's compression of a 2016 statistical finding about contraband and use-of-force rates, presented as if it were the Justice Department's own characterization. Accurate underlying data, sharpened language. |
| PJ Media | U.S. right, opinion-driven | 8 | "DHS Breaks Down What the Big Beautiful Bill Funded for Immigration Enforcement" | Reproduces the DHS press release's structure and numbers as the story, with no outside verification and no critic quoted. Government messaging presented as reporting. |
References
- ICE to open immigration detention center in rural N.C. Gov. Stein says he does 'not want it in our state.' — NPR · U.S. center-left; member-station and donor funded public radio
- ICE plans to open federal immigration detention center in Eastern North Carolina by 2026, says NYT — WRAL · U.S. center; commercial local broadcaster (Capitol Broadcasting)
- ICE plans major new immigrant detention center in eastern North Carolina — NPR · U.S. center-left public radio
- ICE Targets 'Detention Desert' With New Facility in North Carolina — The New York Times · U.S. center-left national daily; subscription funded
- RCI reopening not yet confirmed — Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald · U.S. local commercial weekly serving Hertford County
- Residents, commissioners react to possible ICE detention center in Hertford Co. — WAVY · U.S. center; commercial local broadcaster (Nexstar)
- Department of Justice: Rivers Correctional Institution in Hertford County is a lawless place — NC Newsline · U.S. left; donor-funded States Newsroom network affiliate
- Rivers Correctional Institution Inspection Report, with Federal Bureau of Prisons response — District of Columbia Corrections Information Council · Primary source; D.C. government oversight body
- Rivers Correctional Institution — Wikipedia · Crowd-edited reference; used only for dates, ownership and closure
- DHS and Secretary Mullin Mark One Year Anniversary of Historic Big Beautiful Bill — U.S. Department of Homeland Security · Primary source; U.S. government agency messaging, self-interested
- ICE ramps up deportation push by boosting capacity to 92,600 beds with $38.3B expansion — Fox News · U.S. right; commercial cable and digital news
- Private Prison Firm GEO Group Reports Record $254 Million Profit After New ICE Contracts — Prison Legal News · U.S. left; prisoner-rights advocacy publication (Human Rights Defense Center)
- A former GEO Group executive now runs ICE. The company's government ties run deep — NPR · U.S. center-left public radio
- ACLU FOIA Litigation Reveals ICE Actively Considering Opening Seven New Immigration Detention Centers — ACLU of North Carolina · U.S. left civil-liberties litigation group; party to the underlying lawsuit
- Private Prison in Eastern N.C. May Reopen for Immigration Detention — The Assembly · U.S. center-left North Carolina longform magazine; subscription and donor funded
- More than 200 rally at NC General Assembly to oppose proposed ICE detention facility — CBS17 · U.S. center; commercial local broadcaster (Nexstar)
- 4 ways the 'Big Beautiful Bill' supercharged Trump's immigration crackdown — Reason · U.S. libertarian; Reason Foundation, donor funded
- New Report Details ICE's Expanding and Increasingly Unaccountable Detention System — American Immigration Council · U.S. left; pro-immigration advocacy and legal organization
- Closed federal prison in Hertford County will become ICE facility, newspaper says — WITN · U.S. center; commercial local broadcaster (Gray Media)
- DHS Details What the Big Beautiful Bill Funds for Immigration Enforcement — PJ Media · U.S. right; opinion-forward commercial site (Salem Media)
- Private Prison Companies' Enormous Windfall: Who Stands to Gain as ICE Expands — Brennan Center for Justice · U.S. left-of-center law and policy institute at NYU; foundation funded
- From rural towns to urban centers, proposed ICE detention facilities face local opposition — NPR · U.S. center-left public radio