N.C. A&T Awarded Five-Year, $10 Million Department of War Grant for AI, Autonomy and Quantum Research
The Greensboro university says the award, made through a Department of War program for historically Black colleges and minority-serving institutions, will fund a new program called Accelerate-DAQ and support its bid for top-tier research status.
Five Sentences That Add Up to $10 Million
North Carolina A&T State University told the world on September 11, 2026, that it had won a five-year, $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of War[2][8]. The money launches a new research program called Accelerate-DAQ[1][8]. It covers three areas: trustworthy AI and cyber defense, AI-enabled autonomy, and quantum computing[1]. The Department of War named A&T an inaugural recipient of a program built specifically for historically Black colleges and other minority-serving institutions[1]. The faculty lead is computer science professor Kaushik Roy, working with four co-investigators[1].
None of that is in dispute. What is in dispute is what surrounds it. Some see a research win. Others see one favorable data point sitting inside a much rougher year for the same department's record on race and gender. Both readings can be true at once, because they're about different things.
Why the Pentagon Wants A&T's Students, Specifically
Start with a plain fact about how military research works. Most Department of War projects in AI, autonomy and quantum require researchers who can pass a security clearance, and clearances generally go only to U.S. citizens[1][3]. That shrinks the hiring pool a lot. It also means the department can't just recruit wherever the best engineering talent happens to be worldwide — it has to grow talent at home.
A&T is the largest historically Black university in the country, and it produces a steady stream of American engineering graduates[8]. That's the strategic logic behind funding it: not a gesture, but a supply problem. The department's own solicitation language for this HBCU program describes it as building schools toward "very high research activity" status, not lowering any bar to get there[3].
There's a second pressure pointing the same direction. In February 2026, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered an end to Pentagon-funded graduate attendance at five elite schools — Princeton, Columbia, MIT, Brown and Yale — starting with the 2026-27 school year[5]. So at the same moment the department is pulling back from some traditional research partners, it's also trying to widen the number of schools it works with elsewhere. A&T's grant fits that second track.
There's a real number behind why critics say this shift is overdue. In 2019, HBCUs and other minority-serving institutions received about 1.1% of the department's total research and development spending[9]. That's a tiny sliver of a very large pie — for comparison, the Energy Department gave those schools roughly 1.9% and NASA about 2% that same year[9]. On that reading, one $10 million award doesn't erase decades of a thin slice; it's a first step at best.
The Ladder A&T Is Actually Climbing
University officials describe the grant as more than money for labs — they say it moves A&T toward "Research 1" status, the top tier in the Carnegie Classification system that ranks American universities by research activity[8]. That status isn't symbolic. R1 schools have an easier time recruiting top faculty, competing for future federal grants, and getting taken seriously in national rankings.
Here's the mechanism that makes this grant matter more than its size suggests. R1 status is measured by sustained research spending and by how many doctoral students a school produces, tracked over years[8]. A single one-time gift doesn't move those numbers much. A five-year federal commitment does, because it funds faculty positions and doctoral students continuously rather than in one burst.
A&T also says the award will let it take on "sensitive or classified" research it couldn't previously handle[8]. That's a meaningful trade-off, not just a resume line. Classified work often can't be published, and access can be limited to researchers who hold clearances — which is good for opening a category of contracts but can complicate an academic career built on publishing.
The Overhead Fight Nobody Named A&T In
There's a quieter number that will decide whether grants like this one actually build the labs and hires A&T wants. Universities don't spend federal research money purely on the named project — they also collect "indirect costs," which pay for the shared expenses a grant doesn't itemize: buildings, utilities, compliance staff, IT security[7]. Without that money, a university has to cover those costs itself.
Earlier in 2026, the administration proposed capping those indirect cost rates at 15%, which researchers estimated would have cut roughly $2 billion from the roughly $9 billion the department spends each year on university research[7]. Courts blocked the cap, and new legislation now holds rates at 2024 levels[7]. That fight never mentioned A&T specifically, but it's the backdrop that determines whether a school like A&T can actually afford to grow into the research capacity this grant is meant to fund.
Two True Numbers, Two Different Stories
Set two real, sourced facts side by side. The federal government has increased HBCU funding by roughly $500 million while ending grant programs for Hispanic-Serving Institutions[7]. And Hegseth has blocked promotions for two Black and two female Army officers, a move first reported in detail by NPR[10]. Both are documented. Neither cancels the other out.
Critics of the administration's broader record point to those facts together and argue that one favorable HBCU grant shouldn't be read as evidence the department's approach to race and gender has shifted[4][10]. Some university leaders overseas have gone further, describing the pattern of boosting HBCU money while cutting Hispanic-Serving Institution grants as "divide and conquer" — though that specific characterization of intent is their interpretation, not a documented fact[6].
Supporters counter that judging this grant by an unrelated personnel dispute misses what the award itself does: fund real labs, real faculty lines, and real graduate students at a school that's historically gotten a small share of this kind of money[1][8][9]. Coverage split along roughly those lines. Local and defense-trade outlets led with the dollar figure and the "inaugural recipient" label[2]. An opinion piece framed Hegseth's broader record as a deliberate "whitewashing" campaign, even though the underlying promotion-block reporting itself came from more straight-news outlets[4][10]. An Indian American diaspora outlet told the story mainly through Roy's own background, with the HBCU angle as a secondary detail[1].
What the Grant Doesn't Settle
The $10 million is real, and so is everything it's meant to build over the next five years. It's also small against the roughly $9 billion the department spends annually on university research nationwide — decisive for one campus, not proof of a department-wide shift either way[7]. A&T's researchers will start hiring and building labs long before anyone can say whether this pilot program becomes a template other schools get to use, or a one-off that doesn't repeat.
Summary
North Carolina A&T State University in Greensboro said on September 11, 2026 that it received a five-year, $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of War[2][8]. The money will start a program called Accelerate-DAQ. It covers research in artificial intelligence, autonomy, cyber resilience and quantum systems[8]. The Department of War named A&T an inaugural recipient under its program for historically Black colleges and universities and other minority-serving institutions[1].
A&T is the largest HBCU in the country. School officials say the grant will help it reach "Research 1" status — the top tier in the Carnegie Classification, reserved for universities with the heaviest research activity[8]. The work is organized into three clusters: trustworthy AI and cyber defense, AI-enabled autonomy, and quantum computing[1]. The faculty lead is computer science professor Kaushik Roy[1].
The grant itself is not really in dispute. The argument around it is about context. Supporters point out that HBCUs have long received a thin slice of Pentagon research money — about 1.1% of the department's research and development spending in 2019[9]. On that view, this award starts to fix a real gap. Critics counter that the same department, under Secretary Pete Hegseth, has cut diversity programs and blocked promotions for senior female and Black officers[4][10]. They also note the administration ended grant programs for Hispanic-Serving Institutions while boosting HBCU funding[7]. Some university leaders overseas have called that pattern "divide and conquer"[6].
A second, quieter question is what defense money does to a campus. A&T says the grant will raise its ability to do work in "sensitive or classified" areas[8]. Classified research is closed research: results may not be publishable, and access can be limited to cleared U.S. persons. That is a normal trade at large research universities. It is also the part faculty at some schools have historically pushed back on.
The Event
On September 11, 2026, North Carolina A&T State University announced it had received a five-year, $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of War[2][8]. The grant establishes a new program, Accelerate-DAQ, aimed at expanding the university's defense research capacity[1]. The program targets several of the department's designated Critical Technology Areas, with emphasis on applied artificial intelligence and on quantum and battlefield information dominance[1]. The Department of War named A&T an inaugural recipient under its HBCU and Minority-Serving Institutions program[1].
Undisputed Facts
- The grant is five years and $10 million, awarded to North Carolina A&T State University and announced September 11, 2026[2][8].
- The funded program is called Accelerate-DAQ and has three research clusters: trustworthy AI and cyber defense, AI-enabled autonomy, and quantum computing[1].
- The award came through the Department of War's program for historically Black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions, and A&T was named an inaugural recipient[1].
- The faculty lead is Kaushik Roy; co-investigators include Shyam Aravamudhan, Bishnu Bastakoti, Pankaj Chaudhary and Salil Desai[1].
- University officials say the award supports A&T's goal of reaching Research 1 status and will increase its capacity for sensitive or classified research[8].
- The U.S. Department of Defense was renamed the Department of War, and Pete Hegseth is Secretary of War[5].
- In 2019, Defense Department research and development spending at HBCUs and minority institutions was about 1.1% of the agency's total R&D spending[9].
- In February 2026, Hegseth ordered an end to Pentagon-funded graduate attendance at Princeton, Columbia, MIT, Brown and Yale, starting in the 2026-27 academic year[5].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- Clearable technical labor
- Work in AI, autonomy and quantum for the military generally requires U.S. persons who can hold security clearances. That is a smaller pool than the general engineering workforce. Funding research capacity at large domestic universities that graduate many American engineers is a supply strategy, independent of any statement about equity[1][3].
- Concentration risk in the research base
- Defense research money has historically clustered in a small number of universities; HBCUs and minority institutions drew about 1.1% of the department's R&D spending in 2019[9]. Meanwhile the department is cutting ties with some elite schools[5]. Both pressures point the same way: spread the performer base.
- The R1 ladder is arithmetic
- Research 1 status turns on measurable research activity, so it responds to sustained multi-year awards more than to one-off gifts. A&T's five-year structure matters more than the headline number[8].
- Overhead decides whether growth is affordable
- Indirect cost rates determine whether a grant covers a university's buildings, utilities and compliance staff. A proposed 15% cap would have cut roughly $2 billion from about $9 billion in annual university defense research; courts blocked it and legislation holds rates at 2024 levels[7]. Capacity-building depends on that rate holding.
Material realityA five-year, $10 million award creates real laboratories, faculty lines and graduate slots at N.C. A&T in AI, autonomy, cyber and quantum[1][8]. Against a roughly $9 billion annual defense university research budget, it is a small line item[7]. It is large for one campus and decisive for none. The same department has cut diversity programs[4], blocked promotions for some senior female and Black officers[10], and ended funded graduate attendance at five elite universities[5]. Federal money to HBCUs has risen while Hispanic-Serving Institution grant programs ended[7]. All of these are simultaneously true, and none of them cancels the others.
Narrative as a weaponThree groups are actively shaping how this lands. The university and the Department of War want the story read as capacity-building and merit — a research program with named clusters, a named faculty lead, and an R1 target. The administration's critics want it read as a single favorable data point inside a worse aggregate record, and they have specific, checkable items to cite. International and diaspora outlets want it read as an identity story — either as minority-serving institutions being played against each other, or as an Indian American research achievement. The award's actual terms are not in dispute by anyone. What is being fought over is which surrounding facts belong in the same paragraph as it.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asA&T's case is about capacity, not politics. The university argues that research dollars are how a school builds the labs, the doctoral students and the security infrastructure that let it compete for the next round of dollars — a ladder, not a handout. Reaching Research 1 status in the Carnegie Classification is the stated goal, and R1 is a spending-and-doctorates threshold, so a five-year block of federal research money moves both numbers at once[8]. A&T also argues that HBCU students should not be locked out of the fields — AI, autonomy, quantum — where the best-paid and most consequential jobs will be[1].
WhyInstitutional status and money that compounds. R1 classification changes which faculty A&T can recruit, which federal competitions it can credibly enter, and how it is ranked. Capacity for classified work opens a category of contracts that are closed to schools without it[8].
Impact on themDirectly and materially positive over five years: new research clusters, faculty lines, graduate funding and a claim on top-tier classification[8]. The trade-off is direction — a growing share of the university's research portfolio becomes defense-aligned, and some of it may not be publishable.
Frames it asThe department's argument is that this is talent sourcing, not charity. It says its critical technology areas — applied AI, quantum, battlefield information dominance — face a workforce shortage, and that a research base concentrated in a few dozen universities is a strategic risk. Funding capacity at institutions that already produce large numbers of Black engineers widens the pipeline of clearable American technical workers. The department frames the pilot as building institutions up to a standard, explicitly aiming at 'very high research activity' status, rather than lowering a bar[3].
WhyAccess to researchers and to a broader base of performers, at a moment when the department is also cutting ties with some elite universities[5]. A second incentive is political: showing that its science funding is merit-based and not DEI programming.
Impact on them$10 million over five years is small against a roughly $9 billion annual university research budget[7]. The department's exposure is reputational — if the program works, it is a template; if it stalls, it becomes evidence against capacity-building.
Frames it asTheir argument is not that A&T should refuse the money. It is that one grant does not offset a pattern. They point to the Pentagon's purge of diversity programs under a Trump executive order, and to reporting that Hegseth blocked promotions for two Black and two female Army officers, among others[10]. They note that the administration's roughly $500 million boost for HBCUs came alongside ending grant programs for Hispanic-Serving Institutions — which critics call setting minority-serving institutions against each other[6][7]. Their analogy: praising a repair on one wall of a house while the roof is being removed.
WhyKeeping attention on the aggregate ledger rather than the announcement, and preventing a single favorable award from becoming the summary of the record.
Impact on themMostly political. Hispanic-Serving Institutions bear the concrete loss; California State University leaders warned of 'irreparable harm' to campuses serving Latino students[7].
Frames it asThis group is split, and both halves have a real case. One side argues federal defense money is among the most stable research funding available, and that walking away from it cedes influence over how AI and autonomy get built. The other side argues classified work changes a campus: results that cannot be published do not build a scholar's record, and access rules can exclude international graduate students, who are a large share of U.S. engineering doctoral programs. Both sides also share a concern about the funding environment — the administration proposed capping indirect cost rates at 15%, which would have cut roughly $2 billion from the $9 billion the department spends each year on university research[7].
WhyProtecting the terms on which universities do federal research — publication rights, who can work in a lab, and whether overhead is actually covered.
Impact on themCourts blocked the 15% indirect-cost cap and new legislation instructs the department to hold rates at 2024 levels[7]. 'Indirect costs' are the shared expenses a grant does not itemize — buildings, utilities, compliance staff, IT security. If a grant does not pay them, the university pays from its own funds, which is exactly the money a school like A&T needs to climb toward R1.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.2
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.5 WFDD | U.S. center (public radio, North Carolina) | 2 | "N.C. A&T receives $10 million for defense research" — plain announcement, focused on research areas and the R1 goal. | Uses the neutral shorthand "defense research" and does not engage the renaming of the department or the wider funding fight. Straight local reporting; the omission is context, not spin. |
| Military.com | U.S. center (defense trade press) | 2 | "Hegseth Orders End to Pentagon-Funded Attendance at Several Elite Universities" — reports the decision and names the five schools. | States the action without adjectives and lets the named list carry the weight. Relevant here only as context the local coverage leaves out. |
| FOX8 WGHP | U.S. center-right (local broadcast) | 3 | "North Carolina A&T receives inaugural $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of War" — leads with the dollar figure and the "inaugural" label. | "Inaugural" does framing work: it casts the award as the start of something rather than one item in a contested budget. No mention of concurrent cuts. |
| The American Bazaar | Indian American diaspora outlet | 4 | "Indian American professor leads $10M AI defense research project" — the HBCU award reframed as a diaspora achievement story. | Foregrounds the ethnicity of the faculty lead and four co-investigators; the fact that this is an HBCU capacity grant drops to a supporting detail. |
| University World News | International higher-education press (South Africa-based) | 6 | "Fears of 'divide and conquer' in Trump's HBCU funding boost" — federal HBCU money read as a wedge between minority-serving institutions. | Puts a contested characterization in the headline via anonymous "fears." The underlying fact — HBCU funding up, Hispanic-Serving Institution grants ended — is real and sourced; the causal claim about intent is not. |
| The Daily Beast | U.S. left | 8 | "Pentagon Pete Secretly Targets Women and Minorities in DEI Whitewashing" — Hegseth's record framed as a deliberate purge. | Nickname in the headline, "secretly" and "whitewashing" as characterizations. The promotion-block reporting is specific and checkable; the packaging is opinion-grade. |
References
- Indian American professor leads $10M AI defense research project — The American Bazaar · Indian American diaspora outlet; commercially funded, diaspora-achievement editorial focus
- North Carolina A&T receives inaugural $10 million grant from the U.S. Department of War — FOX8 WGHP · Local broadcast owned by Nexstar Media Group; center-right market orientation
- Department of War Research and Education Program for HBCUs/MIs — Pilot Program solicitation W911NF26S0075 — U.S. Department of War · U.S. federal government; the funding agency itself
- Pentagon Pete Secretly Targets Women and Minorities in DEI Whitewashing — The Daily Beast (Opinion) · U.S. left; privately owned, opinion-forward news site
- Hegseth Orders End to Pentagon-Funded Attendance at Several Elite Universities — Military.com · U.S. center; defense trade press owned by Monster Worldwide, veteran-audience focus
- Fears of 'divide and conquer' in Trump's HBCU funding boost — University World News · International higher-education trade press, South Africa-based; advertiser- and subscription-funded
- Congress set to cut basic defense science funding — Science (AAAS) · Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science; science-community advocacy orientation on research funding
- N.C. A&T receives $10 million for defense research — 88.5 WFDD · North Carolina public radio, licensed to Wake Forest University; member- and CPB-supported
- Defense research funding for HBCUs, minority institutions lags, report says — Higher Ed Dive · U.S. higher-education trade press owned by Informa; advertiser-supported
- Hegseth blocked 2 Black and 2 female soldiers from promotions — NPR · U.S. center; publicly and member-supported national public radio