Asheville-Area Craggy Correctional Center Winds Down for Late-Summer Closure; July Budget Set 15.4% Average Raises for Correctional Officers
State prison officials said in May they would close the 250-inmate Woodfin facility because they could not staff it; the enacted state budget raised officer pay, and Gov. Josh Stein has said more closures are possible without further pay action.
A Prison Closes The Same Year Its Officers Get a Raise
Craggy Correctional Center, a medium-security men's prison in Woodfin, just north of Asheville, is shutting down this summer. State officials announced the wind-down on May 15, 2026, and set closure for "late summer 2026," without naming an exact date[1]. About 250 incarcerated men are being moved to other state prisons. The 77 employees who worked there are being offered jobs at other facilities in western North Carolina, and the state says it doesn't expect any layoffs[1].
Two months later, the same state government did something that looks like it should have prevented this. In July, the General Assembly passed a $34.4 billion budget that sent more than $2.2 billion to the Department of Adult Correction, including an average 15.4% raise for correctional officers[5][6]. That's one of the largest raises this workforce has seen in decades[8].
Both things are true at once. A prison closed for lack of staff, and lawmakers just gave prison staff their biggest raise in years. The raise didn't save Craggy — the decision to close it was already made before the budget passed. The real question is whether it will stop the next one.
Why 20 Officers Couldn't Run a 123-Officer Prison
The state's own explanation for closing Craggy is blunt: it couldn't hire enough people to run it. Of the facility's 77 employees, only about 20 were correctional officers. The National Institute of Corrections says a prison that size needs 123[19]. Craggy had been running at less than half its needed staffing for two years before the state gave up[1].
The pay explains part of the gap. Officers there started at $38,859 a year and topped out at $50,563[19]. That's a single, statewide salary scale — the same number whether the prison sits in a cheap rural county or, like Craggy, just outside Asheville, one of the most expensive housing markets in western North Carolina[3]. State officials said Asheville-area living costs made it impossible to recruit at that pay[1].
That's the structural problem underneath the whole story: North Carolina sets one salary for the entire state, but rent and mortgages are not the same everywhere. A raise that applies equally to every county raises everyone's pay by the same percentage. It doesn't close a gap that's local by nature. Craggy is the clearest example: the prison didn't close because officers statewide were underpaid. It closed because officers in that specific county were priced out.
The Raise Was Already Law By The Time Anyone Argued Over Credit
Gov. Josh Stein had been warning for months that pay was the root cause. On May 27, less than two weeks after the Craggy announcement, he and prison leaders asked the legislature to go further than just raising correctional officers' pay — they wanted supervisors, nurses, and other prison staff included too, since the Republican budget framework at the time left them out[7].
Lawmakers didn't fully grant that ask, but they moved on officers. The enacted budget gave correctional officers an average 15.4% raise once longevity step increases are counted, and probation and parole officers got about 10.1%[5]. Notably, 15.4% is larger than the roughly 15% Stein himself had requested[5][8]. So by the numbers, the two sides ended up closer together than the fight over it suggested.
What the raise hasn't fixed is the vacancy rate. As of June 2026, roughly one in four of the department's 6,574 budgeted correctional officer positions sat empty. Some individual prisons were running around 60% short[5]. The department itself says its pay will still rank among the ten lowest in the country, even after the increase[5][10].
Two Ways to Read the Same Line Item
Stein's case is that a prison isn't a building — it's the staff inside it. You can't safely run a facility built for 123 officers with 20, and when pay falls too far below local housing costs, the state doesn't get a cheaper prison. It gets an empty one it has to close and inmates it has to ship elsewhere[10][17]. In that framing, Craggy is proof of what happens when the state waits too long to fix pay.
Republican legislative leaders point to what they actually delivered: a raise bigger than the governor asked for, funded inside the largest correction-department budget in the state's history[5][6]. They also argue money was never the whole problem. The hiring process itself was so slow that candidates took other jobs while waiting on background checks to clear, which is why the state also launched a pilot letting recruits start before those checks finish — 95 hires at three prisons in four months so far[8]. They further note the same budget trimmed hundreds of vacant, unfilled positions, arguing that funding empty job slots for years wasn't funding officers at all — it was funding vacancies[12].
Officers themselves, through trade outlets that cover their working conditions, put it more plainly than either political side: the raise is "a start, not a solution"[18]. North Carolina still ranks 49th in the nation in starting correctional-officer pay[10]. A 15.4% bump off a base near $38,859 still leaves a job with mandatory overtime and real physical risk, in a county where the raise still might not cover local rent[19][3].
For the roughly 250 men who were housed at Craggy, the story looks different again. They weren't released — they were transferred, some likely hours farther from family[1]. Advocacy groups have long argued that visitation is one of the strongest supports for successful reentry after prison, so moving people farther from home carries its own cost, even when no one disputes the facility had to close[14].
How the Coverage Split
Outlets covering the closure and the raise mostly agreed on the facts, but chose different things to lead with. Carolina Journal, published by the free-market John Locke Foundation, led with the hiring pilot and management fixes rather than the pay gap, consistent with a preference for process reform over more spending[8]. Its opinion section went further, arguing explicitly that supporting police also means paying corrections officers fairly[9].
North Carolina Health News, a nonprofit outlet, conceded the raise but built its story around what's still missing — the vacancy rates and the state's low national pay ranking — with a headline structured around the word "but"[5]. Corrections1, a trade outlet read mostly by working officers, framed every number against national pay rankings, especially the 49th-place stat, reflecting its readership's stake in the outcome[10]. Local TV coverage from WLOS and Spectrum News stayed closer to straight reporting of the closure and the budget figures, though Spectrum's use of the word "forces" to describe the cost-of-living link adopted the state's own causal explanation without attributing it[2][3].
What's Still Open
Craggy's closure is done, or close to it — the inmate transfers are largely finished, and the raise is now law, not a proposal[1][5][6]. What isn't settled is whether a statewide percentage raise can fix a problem that state officials themselves described as local: a salary that can't compete with Asheville-area rent. The state still holds thousands of empty prison beds it can't staff[16]. Whether the 15.4% raise is enough to keep the next short-staffed prison from following Craggy will take months to find out.
Summary
North Carolina is closing Craggy Correctional Center, a medium-security men's prison in Woodfin, just north of Asheville. The state Department of Adult Correction announced the wind-down on May 15, 2026, and set closure for late summer[1]. The reason the agency gave was not policy or crime. It was hiring. Craggy had run at less than half its needed staffing for two years, and the agency said Asheville-area housing costs made it impossible to recruit officers at state pay[1][3]. About 250 incarcerated men are being moved to other state prisons. The 77 employees are being offered jobs at other facilities in western North Carolina, and the agency said it does not expect layoffs[1].
Gov. Josh Stein has used Craggy as a warning. He has said that without better pay for prison staff, more closures could follow[4]. That argument was made most forcefully before the state budget passed. On May 27, Stein and prison leaders asked the General Assembly to extend raises beyond correctional officers to supervisors and support staff, who were left out of the Republican budget framework[7].
Lawmakers then acted. The enacted $34.4 billion state budget sends more than $2.2 billion to the Department of Adult Correction — more than the agency has gotten before — including an average 15.4% raise for correctional officers, with longevity step increases counted in[5][6]. Probation and parole officers got an average 10.1% by the same measure[5]. So the raise is no longer a proposal. It is law.
The real dispute now is whether it is enough, and who was left out. The department says its staff will still be among the lowest paid in the country[5]. Roughly one in four of its 6,574 budgeted correctional officer jobs were vacant as of June, and some prisons run near 60% vacant[5]. Republican legislative leaders point to the size of the raise, one of the largest for these workers in decades, and to management fixes like a fast-track hiring pilot[8]. Critics note the same budget also cut hundreds of vacant positions[12]. Whether the 15.4% raise slows further closures will not be known for months.
The Event
On May 15, 2026, the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction announced it would begin winding down Craggy Correctional Center in Woodfin, Buncombe County, with closure planned for late summer 2026[1]. The agency said about 250 incarcerated men would be transferred to other state prisons over several months, and that its 77 employees would be offered positions at other facilities in western North Carolina, with no layoffs expected[1]. The agency attributed the closure to chronic staff shortages, saying the prison had operated at less than half its needed staffing for two years and that Asheville-area living costs blocked recruitment[1][3]. In July 2026, the General Assembly enacted a $34.4 billion state budget directing more than $2.2 billion to the department, including an average 15.4% raise for correctional officers[5][6].
Undisputed Facts
- NCDAC announced the gradual closure of Craggy Correctional Center on May 15, 2026, with closure set for late summer 2026[1].
- About 250 incarcerated men housed at Craggy are being transferred to other state prisons[1].
- Craggy had 77 employees; the agency said they would be offered other NCDAC jobs in western North Carolina and that no layoffs were expected[1].
- Only about 20 of Craggy's 77 employees were correctional officers, against a National Institute of Corrections staffing recommendation of 123 officers for the facility[19].
- Correctional officer pay at Craggy started at $38,859 and topped out at $50,563 before the new budget[19].
- The enacted state budget of $34.4 billion directs more than $2.2 billion to the Department of Adult Correction, including an average 15.4% raise for correctional officers when longevity step increases are counted[5][6].
- As of June 2026, about one in four of the department's 6,574 budgeted correctional officer positions were vacant, with agency-wide officer vacancy averaging roughly 30% and reaching about 60% at some prisons[5].
- NCDAC and the Office of State Human Resources launched a pilot allowing recruits to begin work before background checks fully clear; it reported 95 hires at three prisons in four months[8].
- Gov. Stein and prison leaders publicly asked the General Assembly on May 27, 2026 to extend raises beyond correctional officers to supervisors and other prison staff[7].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- A salary schedule set statewide meets a housing market that is not
- North Carolina sets correctional officer pay on one statewide scale. Housing costs are not statewide. Craggy's officers started at $38,859 in a county where that does not rent much[19]. So the same paycheck that staffs a prison in a low-cost county cannot staff one near Asheville. A uniform 15.4% raise raises everyone equally; it does not close a gap that is local by nature[3][5].
- Vacancy is self-feeding
- When a prison runs short, the officers who stay work forced overtime. Forced overtime drives resignations. Resignations deepen the shortage. Craggy sat under half-staffed for two years before the state gave up on it[1]. That is the mechanism behind an agency-wide officer vacancy rate near 30%, and near 60% at the worst facilities[5].
- Closing a prison does not shrink the prison population
- Craggy's roughly 250 men were moved, not released[1]. The state has thousands of empty beds elsewhere because it cannot staff them, not because it lacks cells[16]. So closure consolidates people into the facilities that can still be staffed. It saves staff, not inmates.
- Both parties want to own 'pro-officer'
- Stein asked for 15% plus steps; Republicans enacted an average 15.4% with steps[5][8]. The gap between the two asks is small. The fight is less about the number than about who gets credited for it, and whether non-officer prison staff were wrongly excluded[7].
Material realityCraggy Correctional Center is closing regardless of how the pay argument resolves; the decision was made in May and the inmate transfers are largely done[1]. The correctional officer raise is enacted law, not a proposal — an average 15.4% funded within more than $2.2 billion for the department[5][6]. Both of those are settled. What is not settled: whether that raise is large enough to refill roughly a quarter of 6,574 budgeted officer jobs, and whether it can hire anyone in a county where housing costs were the stated reason a prison shut down[3][5]. A statewide percentage raise is a blunt instrument against a local cost problem. Meanwhile the state holds thousands of empty beds it cannot staff, so consolidation pressure continues no matter who wins the framing fight[16].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asTheir case is that a prison is not a building, it is a staff. You cannot safely run a facility with 20 officers when the federal corrections institute says you need 123[19]. When pay falls far enough below what a county's housing costs demand, the state does not get a cheaper prison — it gets an empty one it must close and inmates it must ship elsewhere. Stein has argued the state ranks near the bottom nationally in officer pay and that this is a public-safety cost, not a compassion issue[10][17]. Their second argument, made before the budget passed, was that raising only officers misses the point: a prison also needs supervisors, nurses, and food service, and those workers were left out of the Republican framework[7]. Craggy, in their telling, is the proof-of-concept for what underpay produces[4].
WhyStein needs a corrections system that does not produce a scandal on his watch, and he wants credit for pressing the raise while positioning a Republican legislature as the constraint[7]. NCDAC leadership needs headcount; every argument that wins headcount is one it will make[5].
Impact on themThe agency lost a facility and gained about 250 transferred inmates to absorb elsewhere in an already-short system[1]. It also gained its largest budget ever, more than $2.2 billion, so its leverage argument has partly succeeded[5].
Frames it asTheir strongest case is that they delivered. The enacted budget gave correctional officers an average 15.4% raise — larger than the 15% Stein himself requested — plus step increases, and it is among the biggest raises this workforce has seen in decades[5][6][8]. On principle, they argue money alone was never the whole problem: North Carolina was also losing candidates to a hiring process so slow that applicants took other jobs while waiting, which is why the fast-track pilot matters[8]. They further argue that funding thousands of positions that have sat empty for years is not funding officers, it is funding vacancies, and that trimming hundreds of those lines redirects real dollars to people actually working[12].
WhyThey want the raise to be read as legislative achievement rather than as a response to gubernatorial pressure, and they want fiscal discipline preserved heading into the 2026 midterms[8].
Impact on themThey own the outcome now. If closures continue after a 15.4% raise, the 'pay was the problem' story weakens — but so does their claim that the raise was sufficient[5].
Frames it asOfficers' own trade press put it bluntly: the raise is 'a start, not a solution'[18]. Their argument is about the floor, not the percentage. A 15.4% raise on a starting salary near $38,859 still leaves a job with mandatory overtime, assault risk, and a state ranked 49th in the nation in starting pay[19][10]. In a county like Buncombe, where housing costs drove this closure, the raise does not close the gap between the paycheck and the rent[3]. They also point out that short staffing is self-reinforcing: fewer officers means more forced overtime, which drives more resignations.
WhyPay, safe post coverage, and an end to mandatory overtime. Craggy's staff also want the transfer promise honored in practice, not just on paper[1].
Impact on themCraggy's 77 employees keep jobs but may face longer commutes to other western North Carolina facilities[1]. Officers statewide get the raise[6].
Frames it asTheir concern is distance. Closing a prison does not reduce the number of people incarcerated; it moves them. Transferring roughly 250 men out of the Asheville area can push them hours from family, and visitation is the strongest documented support for successful reentry — a point North Carolina advocacy groups have pressed in related fights over jail visitation[1][14]. They also argue that a system running 30% short on officers, and 60% short at some prisons, is unsafe for the people locked inside it, not just for staff — lockdowns, canceled programs, and missed medical care follow staffing gaps[5][13].
WhyGroups such as Emancipate North Carolina and Disability Rights NC seek both better conditions and a smaller incarcerated population; they have used litigation and public pressure in past North Carolina cases[14].
Impact on themFamilies in western North Carolina lose the closest facility. Transferred men face new housing assignments and program disruption[1].
Frames it asThe county's position is the least ideological. Asheville-area housing costs are now high enough that a state salary schedule set in Raleigh cannot hire there[3]. Local officials can reasonably argue this is a state pay-structure problem, not a local failing: the same salary that staffs a prison in a rural eastern county buys nothing near Asheville. That argument points toward geographic pay differentials rather than uniform statewide raises.
WhyRetain public-sector employers and jobs; avoid a vacant state facility with no reuse plan[1].
Impact on themThe county loses a state employer. A 15.4% statewide raise does not by itself fix a local cost gap, which is the specific reason NCDAC gave for closing Craggy[1][3].
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.1
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLOS | U.S. local TV; owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group, whose corporate commentary leans right | 3 | "Gov. Stein backs prison staff pay increases as Craggy Correctional Center closes" and "Craggy Correctional Center to close as staff struggle with Asheville-area costs, low pay" | Local-impact framing centered on staff hardship and cost of living. It supplies the useful specifics others skip — the 20-officers-versus-123-recommended gap and exact salary band — but pairs the closure directly with Stein's warning, which reads as endorsement of his causal claim. |
| Spectrum News | U.S. center; Charter Communications-owned local news | 3 | "High cost of living forces closure of western N.C. prison" and "State budget will provide raises for prison staff" | The verb 'forces' adopts the agency's causal explanation without attribution. Otherwise straight reporting of the closure and the budget numbers. |
| North Carolina Health News | U.S. nonprofit state outlet; foundation-funded, health and social-safety-net focus, sympathetic to service funding | 4 | "New state budget boosts prison funding, but challenges remain" | The 'but' does the work. It concedes the raise, then pivots to lowest-paid ranking and 30-to-60% vacancy figures. Thorough and numerically careful, but structurally organized around what is still lacking rather than what changed. |
| Carolina Journal | U.S. right; published by the John Locke Foundation, a free-market advocacy group | 4 | "Pilot program aims to ease NC prison staffing crisis" | Leads with an administrative fix and hiring counts rather than with the pay gap. The word 'crisis' appears, but the implied remedy is process reform, not more spending — consistent with the publisher's fiscal stance. |
| The Charlotte Observer | U.S. center-left; McClatchy-owned metro daily | 4 | "NC budget would give raises to officers — and cut hundreds of vacant positions" | The em-dash construction sets the raise against a cut in the same breath. That is real reporting others omitted, but the sentence structure invites the reader to treat the two as offsetting when the budget's own math does not say so. |
| Corrections1 | U.S. corrections trade press; audience is working officers and administrators, editorially aligned with officer interests | 5 | "North Carolina budget includes prison staff raises, but still among nation's lowest-paid" and reader reaction that the raise "is a start, not a solution" | Frames every figure against national pay rankings, especially the 49th-in-starting-pay stat. Useful worker-voice reporting, but the audience guarantees the raise-is-insufficient read. |
| Carolina Journal (Opinion) | U.S. right; John Locke Foundation opinion section | 6 | "To end NC's prison crisis, pay corrections officers fairly" | Explicitly argumentative, and notable for cutting against the outlet's usual spending caution by folding officer pay into 'supporting law enforcement.' Scored as opinion, which it is labeled as. |
References
- NCDAC to begin gradual closure of Craggy Correctional Center — North Carolina Department of Adult Correction · U.S. state government agency — the closing party, primary source
- Craggy Correctional Center to close as staff struggle with Asheville-area costs, low pay — WLOS · U.S. local TV; Sinclair Broadcast Group-owned
- High cost of living forces closure of western N.C. prison — Spectrum News · U.S. center; Charter Communications-owned
- Gov. Stein backs prison staff pay increases as Craggy Correctional Center closes — WLOS · U.S. local TV; Sinclair Broadcast Group-owned
- New state budget boosts prison funding, but challenges remain — North Carolina Health News · U.S. nonprofit; foundation-funded health and safety-net coverage
- State budget will provide raises for prison staff — Spectrum News · U.S. center; Charter Communications-owned
- Gov. Stein, prison leaders call on General Assembly to extend raises to all prison employees — CBS17 · U.S. local TV; Nexstar-owned
- Pilot program aims to ease NC prison staffing crisis — Carolina Journal · U.S. right; published by the free-market John Locke Foundation
- To end NC's prison crisis, pay corrections officers fairly — Carolina Journal (Opinion) · U.S. right; John Locke Foundation opinion section
- North Carolina launches fast-track hiring pilot as state ranks 49th in correctional officer starting pay — Corrections1 · U.S. corrections trade press; officer-audience aligned
- In effort to boost hiring, short-staffed NC prisons are letting people start early — WUNC · U.S. public radio; university-licensed, center-left audience
- NC budget would give raises to officers — and cut hundreds of vacant positions — The Charlotte Observer · U.S. center-left; McClatchy-owned metro daily
- NC prisons face 'dire' staffing crisis — North Carolina Health News · U.S. nonprofit; foundation-funded
- Criminal Justice Reform archives — Emancipate North Carolina · U.S. left; abolitionist and civil-rights advocacy nonprofit
- Asheville prison to close due to difficulty in recruiting new staff, officials say — Fox Carolina · U.S. local TV; Gray Media-owned, Fox network affiliate
- Gov. Stein calls for more funding for prison staffers as 5,000 beds are open in NC — CBS17 · U.S. local TV; Nexstar-owned
- Governor Stein Pushes for Stronger Correctional Officer Recruitment and Retention — Office of the Governor of North Carolina · U.S. state government; Democratic administration, party to the dispute
- Corrections officers respond to N.C.'s pay raise, hiring initiative: 'a start, not a solution' — Corrections1 · U.S. corrections trade press; officer-audience aligned
- Asheville prison closing due to staffing issues — Asheville Citizen Times · U.S. local newspaper; Gannett-owned