Forge Nano Breaks Ground on Morrisville Battery Plant Expansion, Citing More Than 250 Planned Jobs
The company says the expanded Wake County plant will make lithium-ion cells for defense and aerospace customers starting in 2028, backed by a $100 million U.S. Department of Energy award first announced in 2024.
A Building Triples in Size, and So Do the Job Numbers
On August 19, 2026, officials gathered in Morrisville, North Carolina, to break ground on an expansion of Forge Nano's lithium-ion battery plant[1]. Republican Sen. Ted Budd, Democratic Rep. Deborah Ross, Morrisville Mayor TJ Cawley and Energy Department Assistant Secretary Audrey Robertson all showed up[1]. The company says the project will more than triple a 100,000-square-foot building into a campus of roughly 315,000 square feet[1]. It expects to create more than 250 jobs, with cell production starting in 2028[1].
That is the news. But the project itself is not new. Forge Nano first announced this Morrisville plant back in November 2023, standing next to then-Gov. Roy Cooper[3]. The $100 million federal grant behind Tuesday's groundbreaking was announced in September 2024 and finalized in January 2025[5][14]. What happened this week is that construction on the expansion actually started.
That gap between announcement and groundbreaking is the first thing worth noticing. Big factory projects often get announced two or three times: once when the deal is signed, once when the money arrives, and once when shovels hit dirt. Each moment generates its own headline. None of them means the plant is finished, and none of the job figures attached to those headlines quite match the others[1][3][5].
Two Businesses, One Plant, and a Deadline Set by Law
Forge Nano is not one company doing one thing. It sells coating equipment used in chipmaking, and separately it makes battery cells through a unit called Forge Battery[11]. The building that broke ground this week is the battery side. Understanding why the timing matters means understanding a rule most readers have never heard of.
The National Defense Authorization Act includes provisions that start restricting Chinese-linked battery sourcing for the U.S. military beginning in 2028[1]. In plain terms: starting that year, the Pentagon and its contractors will be legally barred from buying certain battery cells that rely on Chinese-linked supply chains. Almost all high-performance lithium-ion cells made today come from Asia, mostly China and South Korea[baseline]. So a legal deadline is about to create a buyer who has no choice but to look for cells made outside that supply chain.
Forge Nano timed its production start to that exact year[1][5]. That is the strength of the plan: a customer who is required by law to buy what you make. It is also the risk, because Congress can move the deadline, and nothing forces it to stay fixed.
Scale matters here too. The new plant will produce about 3 gigawatt-hours of cells a year, or roughly 150 million cells[1]. A gigawatt-hour is enough battery capacity for about 13,000 to 15,000 typical electric cars. That makes this plant small next to the giant factories that supply the EV market. It is not built to compete on price with Chinese or Korean mass producers. It is built to sell smaller volumes of qualified cells to buyers, mostly in defense and aerospace, who are required to source outside that market[1][5].
The Grant That Pays Nothing Up Front
North Carolina's part of the deal is a Job Development Investment Grant worth up to $1,525,500 spread over 12 years[3]. That is not a check the state hands over at the groundbreaking. It is reimbursement, paid only after the state's Commerce and Revenue departments verify that Forge Nano actually hit its hiring and investment targets, set at 204 new jobs and $142 million in investment[3].
That structure is why supporters and critics can point to the same program and reach different conclusions. Supporters, including officials from both parties, say it protects taxpayers: if the jobs never show up, the state pays less or nothing[3]. Critics say the structure doesn't stop the announcement itself from creating a jobs figure that later turns out to be wrong[9].
The free-market John Locke Foundation, through its outlet Carolina Journal, has tracked that gap closely. It reports North Carolina canceled six similar grants in recent years, and that from 2003 through 2025 almost half of all such agreements failed to hit their job targets[9]. Its broader figure, drawn from research spanning two state programs launched in 1993 and 2002, puts total jobs promised at 204,000 against about 95,000 actually delivered[10]. That figure covers three decades of deals, not this one specifically, which makes it a fair read of the program's track record and an imprecise stand-in for any single project[10].
Who Wants What, and Why
Forge Nano's case is straightforward: no single company can build a defense-grade domestic battery supply chain without help, and its Atomic Armor coating technology, applying layers a few atoms thick to battery materials, is what lets it do this at a smaller scale than a typical gigafactory[11]. The company is also mid-process on a SPAC merger valuing it at $1.2 billion, set to list on Nasdaq as NANO[11]. A groundbreaking with a senator, a congresswoman and a federal official is a credibility marker for investors watching that listing close.
The bipartisan turnout is its own story. Republican Sens. Budd and Thom Tillis pushed the Energy Department to fund the project, while Democratic Rep. Ross was the one who announced the award[4]. National security is one of the few frames that plays well for politicians of both parties at once, which helps explain why a 2023 project keeps generating fresh press events.
Samsung SDI's involvement gets less attention in U.S. coverage than it does in Korean trade press. The company invested about $20 million in Forge Nano and signed a conditional agreement to buy cells from the Morrisville plant starting in 2028[7]. South Korean outlet The Elec reported the deal plainly: it lets Samsung SDI sell cells made on U.S. soil, inside American tariff walls and inside the coming rules meant to strip Chinese material from the defense supply chain[7]. Bloomberg's framing leaned toward the money side, describing Samsung as reaching for U.S. defense funding[8]. Both are legitimate reads of the same arrangement; U.S. coverage of the groundbreaking largely left Samsung's angle out.
How the Coverage Split
The company's own release, distributed through GlobeNewswire, called the plant "America's Battery Gigafactory," a slogan that sits oddly next to a facility a fraction of the size of major EV battery plants[1]. WRAL's local coverage led with "Chipmaker's RTP-area expansion," which mislabels the news since the building that broke ground makes batteries, not chips, and stated the national-security benefit as settled fact in its headline rather than attributing it[2].
CleanTechnica credited the $100 million to "Trump Admin" funding, even though the award was announced in September 2024 and finalized in January 2025, under the Biden-era Bipartisan Infrastructure Law[5][6][14]. That framing turns a disbursement into an origin story. Carolina Journal, meanwhile, has not covered this groundbreaking directly, but its adjacent coverage of canceled grants runs far more often than its coverage of successful ones, which shapes what its readers see about the program's overall track record[9][10].
What Happens Between Now and 2028
Nothing that comes out of the Morrisville plant will be sold before 2028[1]. Between now and then sit a SPAC closing, roughly two years of equipment installation, a hiring ramp toward whichever job number ends up being the real one, and a defense sourcing rule that hasn't taken effect yet[1][11]. Every job figure attached to this story, 250, 280, 204, comes from a different document written at a different time, and they don't match[1][3][5].
What no one disputes is the condition driving all of it: almost all high-performance lithium-ion battery cells sold today are made outside the United States[baseline]. Whether this plant, this grant and this legal deadline change that by 2028 is not yet something anyone can verify. For now, what exists is a bigger building, a signed grant that pays only on results, and a calendar everyone involved is watching.
Summary
On August 19, 2026, the advanced-materials company Forge Nano broke ground on an expansion of its lithium-ion battery plant in Morrisville, North Carolina, in Wake County near Research Triangle Park[1]. The company says the project will more than triple a 100,000-square-foot building into a campus of roughly 315,000 square feet and create more than 250 manufacturing, engineering and operations jobs[1]. Cell production is expected to start in 2028[1]. Republican Sen. Ted Budd, Democratic Rep. Deborah Ross, Morrisville Mayor TJ Cawley and Energy Department Assistant Secretary Audrey Robertson attended[1].
Two things are worth pinning down at the start. First, this is not a brand-new project. Forge Nano announced the Morrisville battery plant in November 2023 with then-Gov. Roy Cooper[3]. The $100 million federal award behind the expansion was announced in September 2024 and finalized in January 2025[5][14]. The August 2026 news is that construction on the expansion has begun. Second, Forge Nano runs two businesses. It sells coating equipment used in chipmaking, and it makes battery cells through a unit called Forge Battery[11]. The plant that broke ground is the battery plant.
The money comes from three places. The Energy Department is putting in up to $100 million from the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law[4]. Forge Nano is adding its own capital, bringing the total to roughly $300 million by later reporting[7]. North Carolina approved a state incentive worth up to $1,525,500 over 12 years, paid only if the company actually hires and invests[3]. South Korea's Samsung SDI invested about $20 million and agreed, conditionally, to buy cells from the plant starting in 2028[7].
The genuine dispute is not about whether the groundbreaking happened. It is about whether announced factory jobs turn into real ones, and whether public money should chase them. Supporters — including officials from both parties — argue the U.S. needs battery cells for defense that do not depend on Chinese supply chains, and that no private firm builds that capacity alone[1][4]. Critics, led in North Carolina by the free-market John Locke Foundation, point to the state's own record of canceled grants and unmet hiring targets[9][10]. Both sides agree on the mechanism that matters most: North Carolina's grant pays nothing until the jobs are verified[3][9].
The Event
Forge Nano held a groundbreaking ceremony on August 19, 2026, for an expansion of its lithium-ion battery manufacturing plant in Morrisville, North Carolina[1]. The company said the expansion will add about 3 gigawatt-hours of annual cell capacity, roughly 150 million cells a year, and will more than triple the existing 100,000-square-foot facility[1]. Forge Nano said the project will create more than 250 jobs and that production is expected to begin in 2028[1]. Sen. Ted Budd, Rep. Deborah Ross, Morrisville Mayor TJ Cawley and Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Audrey Robertson took part in the event[1].
Undisputed Facts
- Forge Nano broke ground on the Morrisville battery plant expansion on August 19, 2026[1].
- The company first announced a Morrisville lithium-ion battery plant in November 2023, alongside then-Gov. Roy Cooper, with an initial investment figure of more than $165 million[3].
- The U.S. Department of Energy selected Forge Battery for a $100 million award in September 2024 under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's battery manufacturing grant program; the award was finalized in January 2025[5][14].
- The 2024 federal announcement projected 280 permanent jobs and more than 550 temporary construction and equipment-installation jobs[4][5].
- North Carolina's Economic Investment Committee approved a Job Development Investment Grant of up to $1,525,500 over 12 years, calculated on 204 new jobs and a $142 million capital investment target[3].
- Under that grant, the state pays nothing until the Departments of Commerce and Revenue verify the company met its hiring and investment targets[3].
- Samsung SDI invested about $20 million in Forge Nano in July 2026 and signed a conditional agreement to buy cells made at the plant starting in 2028[7].
- Forge Nano agreed in April 2026 to go public by merging with Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II, at a pre-money equity value of $1.2 billion, with plans to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker NANO[11].
- Republican Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd urged the Energy Department to prioritize funding for the project, and Democratic Rep. Deborah Ross announced the award[4].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- A listing on the calendar
- Forge Nano is closing a SPAC merger valued at $1.2 billion pre-money, with over $367 million in expected pro forma cash[11]. A private company can move quietly. A company about to trade publicly needs visible milestones. The groundbreaking is one, and its timing is not an accident.
- A legal deadline, not a market
- The plant is timed to 2028 because National Defense Authorization Act rules restricting Chinese-linked battery sourcing for the military take effect then[1]. This is demand created by statute. That is the strength of the project — a buyer who must buy — and its risk, because Congress can move the date.
- The state pays last
- North Carolina's Job Development Investment Grant is reimbursement, not a check up front. The state verifies hires and investment first, then pays, over 12 years[3]. That is why both supporters and critics can cite the same program: it limits taxpayer loss when a project fails, but it does not stop announcements from being made about jobs that never arrive[9].
- Scale versus specialty
- 3 gigawatt-hours a year is small for a battery plant. A gigawatt-hour is enough cells for roughly 13,000 to 15,000 typical electric cars. This plant is not built to compete on price with Chinese or Korean volume producers. It is built to sell qualified cells to buyers who are legally barred from the cheaper option.
Material realityA building in Wake County is being enlarged from about 100,000 square feet to roughly 315,000[1]. No cells will come out of it until 2028[1]. The $100 million federal award exists and was finalized in January 2025[14]. The state's $1,525,500 grant does not pay out unless jobs appear[3]. Between now and 2028 sit a SPAC closing, equipment deliveries over two years, a hiring ramp, and a defense sourcing rule that has not yet taken effect. Every job number in this story — 250, 280, 204 — is a projection, and they do not match each other because they come from different documents written at different times[1][3][5]. The one thing not in dispute is that almost all high-performance lithium-ion cells are currently made outside the United States, which is the condition every party here is responding to.
Narrative as a weaponForge Nano is the most active narrative-shaper, and it is speaking to investors as much as to North Carolina. Its "America's Battery Gigafactory" framing wants you to read a 3-gigawatt-hour specialty plant as a national landmark. Officials of both parties want you to read a 2023 announcement's construction start as fresh news, because the national-security frame is one of the few that pays politically in both directions. Free-market critics want you to read any single groundbreaking through a 30-year failure rate, which is honest about the program and imprecise about this deal. Samsung SDI wants the least attention of anyone: its Korean trade coverage says plainly that the point is getting inside U.S. tariff and sourcing walls, a motive that is entirely legitimate and simply less flattering than the ribbon-cutting. The reader's best defense is the calendar. Ask what has actually been built, what has been paid, and what is merely scheduled.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asThe company's case is that the United States cannot buy its way out of a defense battery shortage on the open market. Almost all high-performance lithium-ion cells are made in Asia. Rules in the National Defense Authorization Act begin restricting Chinese-linked battery sourcing for the military in 2028, and the company times its production start to that date[1]. Forge Nano also argues its core technology is the reason it can do this at small scale. Its Atomic Armor process applies coatings a few atoms thick to battery and chip materials, which the company says makes cells last longer and run safer[11]. Its pitch is that a 3-gigawatt-hour plant is small next to an EV gigafactory but is sized correctly for defense, aerospace and heavy-equipment buyers who need reliability more than volume[1][5].
WhyForge Nano is in the middle of going public through a SPAC merger valued at $1.2 billion pre-money[11]. A groundbreaking with a senator, a congresswoman and an Energy Department official is a credibility event for investors ahead of a Nasdaq listing. A signed offtake agreement with Samsung SDI is the demand-side proof point[7].
Impact on themThe company gets up to $100 million in what it calls non-dilutive funding — money that does not require giving up ownership shares, unlike selling stock[5]. It also carries the risk. Production is not due to start until 2028, and it must hire and invest to collect the state grant[3].
Frames it asTheir argument is that this is exactly what performance-based recruiting is supposed to look like. The state grant is capped at $1,525,500 over 12 years and pays only after the Commerce and Revenue departments verify jobs and investment[3]. The state's own estimate is that the project grows the economy by $655 million over the grant term[3]. The national-security argument is what makes this bipartisan: Republican Sens. Tillis and Budd pushed the Energy Department to fund it, and Democratic Rep. Ross announced the award[4]. Officials frame the plant as part of a broader Southeastern "battery belt" that has pulled advanced manufacturing into the region[15].
WhyElected officials on both sides get a groundbreaking photo and a jobs number in an election year. For the state, the Research Triangle's draw is the recruiting pitch — universities, community colleges and a skilled labor pool[3].
Impact on themWake County is a Tier 3 county under North Carolina's economic tier system, meaning it is among the more prosperous. Because of that, the grant also moves $508,500 into the state's Industrial Development Fund Utility Account, which pays for infrastructure in poorer counties[3]. If the company underperforms, the state pays less or nothing — but the political cost of a stalled plant still lands locally.
Frames it asTheir case is not that this company is bad. It is that the program has a measurable failure rate and that government is a poor picker. Carolina Journal, published by the free-market John Locke Foundation, reports that North Carolina canceled six Job Development Investment Grants and that during fiscal years 2003 through 2025 almost half of all such agreements failed to hit their job targets[9]. Locke's own research says fewer than half of promised jobs ever appear[10]. Their strongest recent example is close by: Kempower's Durham plant was on the hook for at least 156 jobs by the end of 2025 at an average salary near $86,000, paused hiring, and had its grant canceled[9]. The principled version of the argument is that a lower, flatter tax code helps every employer, while targeted grants pick winners and quietly shift the burden to firms that got nothing[10].
WhyThe John Locke Foundation is a conservative, free-market state policy group. Its long-running goal is to shrink targeted business subsidies in favor of broad tax cuts.
Impact on themThis camp does not control the outcome, but it shapes how the legislature sizes the incentive pot. Note the arithmetic caution: Locke's 204,000-promised versus 95,000-delivered figure is a cumulative total across two programs since 1993 and 2002[10]. It is a fair指 measure of the programs' history, not a prediction about this specific plant.
Frames it asSamsung SDI's argument, as reported in Korean and financial trade press, is practical rather than ideological. It has manufacturing know-how the U.S. lacks and wants a foothold inside U.S. rules. Building through a partner is faster and cheaper than building alone. Cells made in Morrisville are American-made cells: they sit inside tariff walls and inside the coming defense sourcing rules that aim to remove Chinese material from the military supply chain[7]. Bloomberg framed the tie-up as Samsung reaching for U.S. defense money[8].
WhySamsung SDI is pushing solid-state battery work at home while trying to open a U.S. defense and aerospace channel. A $20 million stake plus a conditional purchase agreement is a low-cost option on that market[7].
Impact on themIf the plant hits 2028, Samsung SDI gets tariff-protected supply and a defense-qualified U.S. source. If it slips, its exposure is small. That asymmetry is worth noticing: the Korean partner's downside is far smaller than the state's or the company's.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 5
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Elec | South Korean electronics trade publication | 3 | "Samsung SDI, Forge Nano Form Battery Alliance to Target US Defense and Aerospace Markets" | Refreshingly blunt about the motive U.S. coverage tends to soften: the alliance lets Samsung SDI dodge tariffs with American-made cells and satisfy rules purging Chinese material from U.S. defense supply. The omission runs the other way — North Carolina, the jobs and the public money barely appear. |
| WRAL | U.S. center, North Carolina local | 4 | "Chipmaker's RTP-area expansion promises 250 jobs — and a boost to national security" | Two slips in one line. Forge Nano makes chipmaking equipment and coatings, but the building that broke ground is a battery plant, so "chipmaker" mislabels the news. And "a boost to national security" is stated as fact in the headline rather than attributed to the officials who said it. |
| Bloomberg | U.S. center, financial | 4 | "Samsung Teams Up with US Battery Startup Eyeing Defense Funds" | "Eyeing defense funds" puts the subsidy chase at the center and treats the plant as a means to it. That is a defensible investor-side read, but it frames a manufacturing story as a money story and leaves the 2028 sourcing rules — the reason the timing exists — out of the headline. |
| CleanTechnica | U.S. left-leaning clean-energy advocacy site | 6 | "Lithium-Ion Batteries Tapped For $100 Million from Trump Admin." | The credit line is the spin. The $100 million was awarded in September 2024 and finalized in January 2025 under the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law[5][14]. Naming the current administration in the headline turns a disbursement into an origin story — likely to make a point about clean-energy money surviving, but it misstates who created the award. |
| Carolina Journal | U.S. right; published by the John Locke Foundation, a conservative free-market policy group | 6 | Has not covered this groundbreaking directly. Its adjacent coverage runs as "NC Commerce cancels six JDIG projects" and the opinion piece "Corporate subsidies and taxpayer risk." | Selection is the frame. The outlet covers canceled and failed grants closely and successful ones lightly, so its readers see the program's failure rate without the base rate. Its cumulative "204,000 promised, 95,000 delivered" figure spans two programs since 1993 and 2002 and is presented without that span in the headline. |
| GlobeNewswire | Company press release — distributed, not reported | 7 | "Forge Nano Breaks Ground on 'America's Battery Gigafactory' to Strengthen U.S. Defense Supply Chains" | "America's Battery Gigafactory" is a slogan in quotation marks doing the work of a fact. At 3 gigawatt-hours a year, the plant is small next to U.S. EV battery plants that run ten to thirty times larger. The release also leads with defense supply chains rather than with the 2028 production date. |
References
- Forge Nano Breaks Ground on "America's Battery Gigafactory" to Strengthen U.S. Defense Supply Chains — GlobeNewswire · Company press release distributed by a paid newswire; not independent reporting
- Chipmaker's RTP-area expansion promises 250 jobs — and a boost to national security — WRAL · Raleigh commercial TV newsroom; mainstream local, center
- Governor Cooper Announces New Lithium-Ion Battery Plant Planned for Morrisville — North Carolina Department of Commerce · State government agency; promotional toward its own recruiting record
- Congresswoman Ross Announces $100 Million in Federal Funding for Forge Battery Manufacturing from Bipartisan Infrastructure Law — Office of U.S. Rep. Deborah Ross · Democratic member of Congress; credit-claiming release
- Forge Battery Selected for $100M Award Negotiation with U.S. Department of Energy to Expand Production Capacity of North Carolina Lithium-Ion Battery Gigafactory — GlobeNewswire · Company press release distributed by a paid newswire
- Lithium-Ion Batteries Tapped For $100 Million from Trump Admin. — CleanTechnica · U.S. clean-energy advocacy site; ad- and sponsorship-funded, editorially pro-electrification
- Samsung SDI, Forge Nano Form Battery Alliance to Target US Defense and Aerospace Markets — The Elec · South Korean electronics-industry trade outlet; industry-sourced, subscription and ad funded
- Samsung Teams Up with US Battery Startup Eyeing Defense Funds — Bloomberg · U.S. financial news organization owned by Bloomberg L.P.; investor-oriented
- NC Commerce cancels six JDIG projects — Carolina Journal · Published by the John Locke Foundation, a conservative free-market policy group in North Carolina
- Corporate subsidies and taxpayer risk — Carolina Journal (Opinion) · Opinion column from the John Locke Foundation's outlet; explicitly anti-targeted-subsidy
- Forge Nano to go public via $1.6B SPAC, becoming CU Boulder's 11th unicorn — University of Colorado Boulder Venture Partners · University tech-transfer office; promotional toward its own spinouts
- Forge Nano breaks ground on battery gigafactory in North Carolina — Evertiq · Swedish electronics-industry trade publication; ad-funded trade press
- Clawback Report — North Carolina Incentives Clawback Report — North Carolina Department of Commerce · State government agency data on recovered incentive payments
- Forge Battery secures $100M in funding from DOE — Green Car Congress · U.S. trade blog covering sustainable transport; technology-friendly
- Forge Nano's new Triangle factory will add to North Carolina's growing 'battery belt' — Axios · U.S. digital news company; center, brevity-focused local edition