North Carolina Governor Opposes Reported ICE Plan to Reopen Winton Prison as 1,400-Bed Detention Center
News reports based on internal ICE documents say the shuttered, GEO Group-owned Rivers Correctional Institution would reopen this fall as North Carolina's first dedicated federal immigration detention center; Gov. Josh Stein says he opposes it, and the Department of Homeland Security has not confirmed the plan.
A Prison Empty Five Years, A Job Posting That Wasn't
Rivers Correctional Institution has sat empty in Winton, North Carolina, since 2021[5][3]. It has cells, fencing, and everything else a 1,400-bed prison needs, built and ready. It just has no one inside it.
That's about to change, according to internal ICE documents obtained by The New York Times[6]. The agency reportedly plans to reopen Rivers as a federal immigration detention center by the end of 2026[6][5]. GEO Group, the company that owns the building, has already posted a job listing for a facility maintenance manager there[3].
The Department of Homeland Security says it has "no new detention center to announce[5]." It has not confirmed or denied that Rivers is the site. A finished prison, a maintenance job posting, and a federal agency saying it has nothing to say: those three facts sit together uneasily, and nobody has resolved the tension between them yet.
What Nobody Disputes
Strip away the argument, and the facts are simple. Rivers sits in Hertford County, in rural northeastern North Carolina, and GEO Group owns it[5][3]. The prison closed after the Biden administration moved to end federal contracts with privately run prisons, and it employed about 300 people before that happened[5][3].
North Carolina has no dedicated federal immigration detention center today[3][6]. If Rivers reopens as reported, it would be the state's first, and one of the largest immigration jails on the East Coast[5][3].
Because GEO owns the building outright, and any contract would be a federal one, the state government doesn't get a vote[1][5]. Hertford County's Board of Commissioners has largely stayed out of the fight, saying decisions about the site are made at the federal level[5]. On July 24, Gov. Josh Stein said he opposes the plan anyway[1][2].
The Governor Concedes Ground Before He Fights
Stein's position is worth reading closely, because it isn't a blanket objection to immigration enforcement. He said people in the country illegally who commit violent crimes should be deported[1]. That's the part opponents of his position might expect him to skip. He didn't.
His actual objection is narrower and sharper. He said ICE "has a proven track record of arresting, detaining, and abusing American citizens," and that most people ICE detains have no criminal record[1]. His argument is about who ends up in the building and how they're treated, not about whether the building should exist at all.
Stein also said something that cuts against his own authority: the property isn't state-owned, so he can't block a deal from happening[1][5]. That's an unusual thing for a governor to say out loud. It tells residents plainly that his opposition is a political statement, not a legal one, and that the real decision sits in Washington.
Why ICE Calls North Carolina a "Detention Desert"
The federal case for Rivers rests on a specific problem ICE has a name for: a "detention desert[6]." That means a state where ICE has no dedicated facility to hold the people it arrests. Right now, someone picked up in North Carolina gets bused or flown to a facility in Georgia or Louisiana, often hundreds of miles from their family and their lawyer.
That distance is exactly what immigrant-rights groups say hurts detainees most. It's also exactly what ICE points to as the reason to build closer to home. Both sides are describing the same gap in ICE's map; they just disagree about whether closing it helps people or exposes more of them to detention in the first place.
Congress gave ICE the money to act on that logic. The 2025 budget reconciliation law set aside roughly $45 billion for immigration detention, available through September 2029[9]. That's a multi-year commitment, not a one-year budget line, which means ICE can sign long-term contracts without waiting on next year's appropriations fight. The agency held more than 60,000 people in detention in 2026, up from about 40,000 in early 2025, with reported plans to reach as many as 90,000[12][13]. Filling that many beds fast means using buildings that already exist.
A Business Built on Empty Prisons
That's where GEO Group's incentives come in, and they're unusually easy to trace because the company reports them to investors. GEO doesn't just run prisons; it owns many of them outright, including Rivers. When a contract ends, the building doesn't go away. It sits there, costing GEO nothing to hold onto and earning nothing until a new contract fills it again.
Reopening those idle, already-built prisons has become the company's main growth strategy. In the past year, GEO signed ICE contracts covering about 6,000 beds across four sites, three of which were previously idle prisons the company already owned in New Jersey, Michigan, and Georgia[10]. Rivers fits that same pattern exactly. GEO's own executive chairman told investors back in August 2025 that the company hoped to reopen it and was already in talks with ICE[5].
The numbers show why. ICE contracts now make up 51% of GEO's total revenue[10]. First-quarter 2026 revenue hit $705.2 million, up 17% from a year earlier, and net income nearly doubled to $38.3 million[10][9]. The company has raised its full-year guidance to as much as $3.1 billion[10]. None of that proves a Rivers contract is signed. It does show a company for whom reactivating exactly this kind of building is now the core of the business, not a side bet.
A Poor County, and a Death Rate Neither Side Disputes
Hertford County has fewer than 20,000 residents, and about 23% of them live in poverty, nearly double the state's rate[3]. That's the backdrop for a genuine local split. Some residents want the roughly 300 jobs back. One resident told reporters the county "needs jobs that don't profit off other people's pain and suffering," rejecting the trade outright[3].
Civil-liberties groups point to GEO's own history at this specific site: the company previously lost its federal contract there after findings of violence and sexual assault, and former officers were later sentenced for contraband and bribery[7][8]. They argue that record is the best evidence available for what happens if Rivers reopens under the same operator.
They also point to a broader pattern that isn't in dispute. Human Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights reported in June 2026 that deaths in ICE custody are happening at the highest rate in more than a decade, roughly one every nine days[12]. Part of that is simple math: the detained population grew by half, from about 40,000 to over 60,000 people[12]. But the researchers' central finding is about the rate of death per person held, not just the raw count, and that isn't explained by growth alone. The United Nations' human rights chief has called for a formal investigation[11][13]. DHS hasn't published a rebuttal to the finding, and no court or inspector general has ruled on it either way.
Coverage of all this split along predictable lines. Carolina Journal, a conservative outlet, led with the jobs and the "first in the state" framing and largely left out the death-rate data[3]. NC Newsline and Truthout, on the left, called it a "mass detention facility" and led with GEO's history of violence at the site, even though no document uses the word "mass" for a reported 1,400 beds[5][8]. Al Jazeera folded the story into a wider argument about the United States facing international human-rights scrutiny[13]. WRAL's headline attributed the plan to the Times's reporting rather than stating it as fact, which was about as careful as the coverage got[4].
The building, the money behind it, and the mortality data aren't going anywhere while this plays out. GEO hasn't confirmed a signed contract. DHS hasn't confirmed a site. The maintenance manager job posting is still up.
Summary
A closed federal prison in the small town of Winton, North Carolina, may reopen as an immigration jail. Internal ICE documents obtained by The New York Times say the agency plans to open a detention center at the former Rivers Correctional Institution by the end of 2026[6]. The reported size is about 1,400 beds. That would make it one of the largest immigration detention centers on the East Coast, and the first dedicated one in North Carolina[5][3]. The building is owned by GEO Group, a publicly traded private prison company[5].
Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, said on July 24 that he opposes the plan[1][2]. He said violent criminals in the country illegally should be deported. But he also said ICE 'has a proven track record of arresting, detaining, and abusing American citizens,' and that most people ICE detains have no criminal record[1]. Stein also made a point that limits his own power: the site is privately owned, so the federal government does not need state approval to open it[1][5]. The Department of Homeland Security says it has no new detention center to announce and has not confirmed the Rivers plan[5].
The fight is not really about zoning. Supporters of the plan point to a practical problem ICE calls a 'detention desert'[6]. North Carolina has no dedicated ICE facility today. So people arrested in the state get bused or flown to Georgia or Louisiana — far from their families and lawyers. A local facility would keep them closer. Opponents say the same building would pull more people into detention in the first place, and they point to conditions. Human Rights Watch reported in June 2026 that the death rate in ICE custody is the highest in more than a decade[12].
The single sharpest dispute is over what a detention bed does. One side sees a needed piece of a lawfully funded enforcement system, plus about 300 jobs in a county where roughly 23% of people live in poverty[3]. The other side sees a company with a documented financial interest in filling beds, in a place with little power to say no. Both descriptions can be true at once, and neither has been resolved by any government finding.
The Event
On July 23–24, 2026, news organizations reported that internal ICE documents show the agency plans to open a detention center at the former Rivers Correctional Institution in Winton, Hertford County, North Carolina, by the end of the year[6][5]. The reported facility would hold about 1,400 people and be operated by GEO Group, which owns the site[5][3]. On July 24, Gov. Josh Stein said publicly that he opposes the plan and does not want the facility in the state, while noting the property is not state-owned[1][2]. The Department of Homeland Security said it had no new detention center to announce and did not confirm whether Rivers is under consideration[5].
Undisputed Facts
- The Rivers Correctional Institution sits in Winton, in Hertford County, in rural northeastern North Carolina, and is owned by GEO Group[5][3].
- The prison closed in 2021 after the Biden administration moved to end federal contracts with privately operated prisons, and has sat empty since[5][3].
- Before it closed, the facility employed about 300 people in Hertford County[3].
- North Carolina currently has no dedicated federal immigration detention center[3][6].
- The Department of Homeland Security has not publicly confirmed the reported plan and says it has no new detention center to announce[5].
- Because the property is privately owned and any contract would be federal, state government approval is not required to open it[1][5].
- In August 2025, GEO Group Executive Chairman George Zoley told investors on an earnings call that the company hoped to reopen Rivers and was in talks with ICE[5].
- GEO Group reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $705.2 million, up 17% from $604.6 million a year earlier, and said ICE contracts made up 51% of company revenue[10][9].
- Congress's 2025 budget reconciliation law provided roughly $45 billion for immigration detention, available through September 30, 2029[9].
- More than 200 people rallied at the North Carolina General Assembly in May 2026 to oppose an ICE detention facility in the state[15].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- A bed target set in Washington
- Congress put roughly $45 billion for detention into the 2025 reconciliation law, available through September 30, 2029[9]. That matters mechanically. Money appropriated for several years at once is not subject to the annual budget fight, so ICE can sign multi-year contracts with confidence. The agency held more than 60,000 people in 2026, up from about 40,000 in early 2025, with reported plans to reach up to 90,000[12][13]. Beds must come from somewhere, and empty prisons are the fastest source.
- Reactivating idle assets is GEO's core business model
- GEO owns Rivers outright and has earned nothing on it for five years[3]. Its 2025–2026 growth came from exactly this move: ICE deals covering about 6,000 beds at four facilities, three of them previously idle company-owned sites in New Jersey, Michigan and Georgia[10]. ICE contracts are now 51% of revenue[10]. Rivers is not an outlier for GEO. It is the next item on a list.
- The state has no legal veto
- Because GEO owns the building and any contract is federal, North Carolina cannot block it through zoning or permits[1][5]. This shapes every actor's behavior. Stein can oppose loudly at no legal cost. County commissioners can point upward and stay quiet[5]. Opponents must aim at Congress, the courts, or public pressure, because there is no local approval vote to lose.
- A poor county with weak bargaining power
- Hertford County has fewer than 20,000 residents and a poverty rate near 23%, close to double the state rate[3]. Facilities like this are consistently sited in places like this. The reason is not conspiracy; it is that cheap land, spare buildings, and demand for 300 payroll jobs all cluster in the same counties[3].
- Geography drives the transfer argument on both sides
- With no facility in North Carolina, people arrested there are moved out of state. Opponents cite those transfers as a harm. ICE cites the same gap as the reason to build[6]. Both are describing one fact. They disagree about which direction it points.
Material realityA finished 1,400-bed prison stands empty in Winton and has since 2021[5][3]. It has cells, a perimeter, and infrastructure that would cost hundreds of millions to build new. GEO Group owns it and has posted a maintenance manager job there[3]. ICE has multi-year money and a bed target well above its current capacity[9][12]. North Carolina has no legal tool to stop a federal contract on private land[1][5]. Meanwhile the human record is also fixed: Human Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights jointly reported in June 2026 that the death rate in ICE custody is the highest in more than a decade, at roughly one death every nine days, and the UN human rights chief has called for an investigation[12][11]. Read those two facts together carefully. The raw number of deaths rises partly because the detained population rose by half, from about 40,000 to over 60,000[12]. But the report's central claim is about the rate, not the raw count — deaths per person detained, which is not explained by growth alone. DHS has not published a rebuttal to that finding, and no court or inspector general has ruled on it. Whatever narrative wins, the building, the money and the mortality data all stay where they are.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asStein's argument starts by conceding ground, which is what makes it hard to dismiss. He says people here illegally who commit violent crimes should be deported[1]. His objection is to the operator and the record, not to immigration enforcement as such. He argues ICE 'has a proven track record of arresting, detaining, and abusing American citizens,' and that the large majority of people it detains have no criminal record[1]. His second argument is about trust and consent: a federal agency should not drop the East Coast's largest detention hub into a small, poor county that never asked for it[1][5]. His third is institutional. He is telling residents plainly that he cannot stop it, which is both an admission and an indictment of how little say a state has[1].
WhyStein needs to satisfy a Democratic base that wants him to fight the Trump administration, without handing Republicans a 'soft on crime' line in a state that has expanded sheriff cooperation with ICE[5]. Opposing a facility he cannot legally block lets him do both. It is a costless position in legal terms and a valuable one in political terms.
Impact on themThe state has no veto here, so Stein's practical levers are narrow: inspections, state licensing of things like water and sewer service, and public pressure[1][5]. There is one concrete state interest at stake. North Carolina's prison system told WRAL it worries the new site would recruit guards away from already-understaffed state prisons, which are major employers in several northeastern counties[3][4].
Frames it asThe federal case rests on three planks. First, authority: immigration enforcement is a federal power, and a governor's disapproval is not a legal veto — the building is private and the contract would be federal[1][5]. Second, logistics, and this is the strongest and least-heard argument. ICE has described North Carolina as a 'detention desert'[6]. With no facility in the state, people arrested in North Carolina are moved hundreds of miles to Georgia or Louisiana. That is the same long-distance transfer that immigrant advocates themselves condemn, because it separates people from their families and their lawyers. A facility in Winton would keep North Carolina cases in North Carolina. Third, mandate: Congress appropriated roughly $45 billion for detention through 2029[9]. Building capacity is carrying out a law that passed, not defying one.
WhyThe administration has set a detention target far above current capacity. ICE held more than 60,000 people in 2026, up from about 40,000 in early 2025, with reported plans to reach up to 90,000 by year's end[12][13]. Hitting that number requires beds fast. Reopening a finished, empty prison is the cheapest and quickest way to add 1,400 of them.
Impact on themA confirmed Rivers contract would close the East Coast's biggest gap in ICE's map and reduce costly long-haul transfers. It also concentrates political and legal risk in one place. ACLU FOIA litigation shows Rivers is one of several sites ICE has been weighing, so a loss here is not fatal to the plan[16].
Frames it asGEO's public case is that it is a government contractor, not a policymaker. It does not decide who is detained; it houses people the government has decided to detain, under federal standards and federal oversight. Its second argument is about capacity the country already paid for. Rivers is a built, staffed-once, code-compliant facility sitting empty for five years[3]. Reactivating it is cheaper for taxpayers than new construction. Its third argument is local: it is one of the few employers that can bring roughly 300 jobs back to a county of fewer than 20,000 people[3].
WhyThe financial incentive is documented in GEO's own filings and is unusually direct. ICE contracts now make up 51% of GEO's revenue[10]. In 2025 the company won or expanded contracts worth up to about $520 million in new yearly revenue — what CEO Zoley called the most new business the company had ever won in one year[10]. Its recent playbook is specifically to restart idle prisons it already owns: it signed ICE deals covering about 6,000 beds at four sites, three of them previously idle company-owned facilities in New Jersey, Michigan and Georgia[10]. Rivers fits that pattern exactly. Zoley told investors in August 2025 that GEO hoped to reopen it[5].
Impact on themQ1 2026 net income nearly doubled to $38.3 million from $19.5 million a year earlier[10]. That is the profit left after costs — a signal of how much reactivating idle beds moves the bottom line. GEO raised 2026 guidance to $2.95–3.10 billion in revenue[10]. It has already posted a facility maintenance manager job at Rivers, a prison empty for five years[3]. Critics read that posting as proof the deal is effectively done; GEO has not confirmed a contract.
Frames it asLocal opinion is genuinely split, and the split is about what counts as development. Some residents say the county needs the payroll: about 300 jobs in a county of fewer than 20,000 people, where roughly 23% live in poverty — nearly double the statewide rate[3]. Others reject the trade outright. One resident told reporters, 'Rivers is not an economic development. It's not what we need,' and said the county 'needs jobs that don't profit off other people's pain and suffering'[3]. The county is majority Black, with Haitian and Mexican communities, so some residents see neighbors, not abstractions, filling the beds[3]. The Board of Commissioners has largely stayed out of it, saying in a statement that Rivers is privately operated and that decisions about its use are made at the federal level[5].
WhyLocal officials have almost no legal leverage and a real fiscal need. Saying 'this is a federal decision' avoids picking a fight they would lose while keeping the tax base and jobs in play[5]. Residents who oppose it are trying to build enough public pressure to make Rivers politically expensive before a contract is signed.
Impact on themIf it opens, the county gains payroll and property activity it has not had since 2021. It also becomes the address of one of the East Coast's largest immigration jails, with the traffic, litigation and national attention that brings. If it does not open, the building stays empty.
Frames it asTheir case is evidence-first, and it has two parts. On this building: GEO previously lost federal contracts to hold people at Rivers after findings of violence and sexual assault, and former officers there were recently sentenced for contraband and bribery[7][8]. Their argument is that the operator's own record at this exact site is the best available forecast. On the system: Human Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights reported in June 2026 that deaths in ICE detention are running at roughly one every nine days, the highest mortality rate in over a decade[12]. UN High Commissioner Volker Türk called for an investigation[11][13]. Their deeper claim is about supply and demand — that beds do not just hold people already arrested, they set the pace of arrests, because capacity is what enforcement scales to.
WhyThese groups want to stop the facility before a contract exists, since blocking a signed federal contract is far harder. ACLU FOIA litigation forcing disclosure of ICE's site list is part of that strategy[16]. Publicity and early litigation are their main tools, because they have no formal role in federal contracting.
Impact on themA 1,400-bed facility in North Carolina would sharply increase detention near their client base. It would also put detainees closer to North Carolina lawyers — a fact that cuts against their opposition, and one their opponents raise. Their organizations are advocacy nonprofits, not neutral referees; their funding comes largely from donors aligned with immigrant-rights and civil-liberties causes.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.3
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRAL | U.S. center | 2 | ICE plans to open federal immigration detention center in Eastern North Carolina by 2026, says NYT | The headline attributes the claim to the Times rather than asserting it, which is the most careful framing in the set. It also carries the state prison system's staffing worry — a concrete local angle both national camps skipped. |
| The New York Times | U.S. center-left | 3 | ICE Targets 'Detention Desert' With New Facility in North Carolina | The Times broke the story from internal documents and used ICE's own term 'detention desert' in quotes, which is close to straight sourcing. The verb 'Targets' still casts the agency as acting on a place rather than filling a gap, and the piece leads with scale rather than with DHS's non-confirmation. |
| Carolina Journal | U.S. right | 4 | ICE eyes opening 1st NC federal detention center in Winton | 'Eyes' is hedged and accurate, and the piece carries the 300-jobs figure and the poverty rate. The angle shows in what is missing: the deaths-in-custody data and GEO's record at Rivers appear far less prominently than in left-leaning versions. It is published by the free-market John Locke Foundation. |
| WUNC | U.S. center-left | 4 | ICE to open immigration detention center in rural N.C. Gov. Stein says he does 'not want it in our state.' | The headline states 'ICE to open' as settled, then hands the frame to Stein's quote. DHS's non-confirmation is real news and lands lower in the story. Public radio funding leans on member donors and grants in a state where that base skews Democratic. |
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 4 | UN rights chief calls for probe into migrant deaths in US detention centres | Al Jazeera covers the North Carolina plan mainly as one more data point in a human-rights story about the United States. The framing device is deference to a UN official, which lets strong criticism arrive as institutional fact rather than editorial opinion. The Qatari government funds the network, and U.S. rights coverage is a durable editorial priority. |
| NC Newsline | U.S. left | 6 | ICE expected to open mass detention facility in NC, sparking anger, pushback | 'Mass detention facility' appears in no document; the reported figure is 1,400 beds. 'Sparking anger' puts the reaction ahead of the fact. Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a progressive-funded nonprofit network. Its reporting on GEO's finances and DHS's non-denial is nonetheless specific and checkable. |
| Truthout | U.S. progressive | 7 | ICE to Reopen Private Prison as Massive North Carolina Detention Center | 'Massive' does the work a number should do, and the headline treats an unconfirmed plan as done. The piece leads with GEO's prior findings of violence and sexual assault at Rivers — genuinely relevant history, placed to set the reader's verdict before the facts. Truthout is a donor-funded progressive nonprofit. |
References
- Stein opposes ICE detention facility in Hertford County — WITN · Local commercial TV (Gray Media); conventional local-news framing, no strong ideological lean
- ICE to open immigration detention center in rural N.C. Gov. Stein says he does 'not want it in our state.' — WUNC · Public radio, university-licensed and member/grant funded; U.S. center-left in story selection
- ICE eyes opening 1st NC federal detention center in Winton — Carolina Journal · Published by the John Locke Foundation, a free-market, conservative North Carolina policy group
- ICE plans to open federal immigration detention center in Eastern North Carolina by 2026, says NYT — WRAL · Commercial Raleigh TV/news site (Capitol Broadcasting); mainstream state-politics reporting
- ICE expected to open mass detention facility in NC, sparking anger, pushback — NC Newsline · Nonprofit outlet in the States Newsroom network; progressive-aligned donor funding
- ICE Targets 'Detention Desert' With New Facility in North Carolina — The New York Times · For-profit national newspaper; U.S. center-left editorial orientation, originator of the internal-documents reporting (read via republication)
- ICE Plans to Open Detention Center in NC by End of 2026 — ACLU of North Carolina · Civil-liberties advocacy organization; a party opposing the facility, not a neutral source
- ICE to Reopen Private Prison as Massive North Carolina Detention Center — Truthout · Donor-funded progressive nonprofit news organization; explicitly left advocacy journalism
- GEO Group (GEO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript — The Motley Fool · Retail-investor financial media; transcript of the company's own statements to investors
- GEO Group Q1 2026 slides: earnings double amid ICE contract growth — Investing.com · Commercial financial-data site; reports company-disclosed figures for investors
- US: Türk alarmed at deaths in ICE custody, calls for urgent preventive action — United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights · UN human-rights body; mandate-driven and critical of member states on detention conditions
- Dying in Detention: Rising Deaths in an Expanding US Immigration Detention System — Human Rights Watch · International human-rights advocacy organization; foundation and individual funded, consistently critical of U.S. detention policy
- UN rights chief calls for probe into migrant deaths in US detention centres — Al Jazeera · Funded by the government of Qatar; sustained editorial focus on U.S. human-rights conduct
- ICE plans major new immigrant detention center in eastern North Carolina — WFAE · Charlotte public radio, member and grant funded; U.S. center-left in story selection
- More than 200 rally at NC General Assembly to oppose proposed ICE detention facility — CBS 17 · Local commercial TV (Nexstar); event-driven local reporting
- ACLU FOIA Litigation Reveals ICE Actively Considering Opening Seven New Immigration Detention Centers — American Civil Liberties Union · Civil-liberties advocacy organization and litigant in the underlying FOIA case; documents obtained are primary, the framing is not neutral