MGM Resorts Discusses a Bid for Barry Diller's People Inc., WSJ Reports, a Day After People Dropped Its $48.30-a-Share Offer for MGM
People Inc., the publisher of Food & Wine and Southern Living, saw its shares rise more than 11% on Friday after the report. MGM shares fell almost 3%, following an 11% drop the day before.
The Buyer Became the Target
Two days before, Barry Diller wanted to own MGM Resorts. On Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2026, his company, People Inc., withdrew its offer to buy every share of MGM it didn't already own [2]. The price on the table had been $48.30 a share in cash, an offer valuing MGM at more than $18 billion once debt was counted [7][8]. By Thursday evening, the trade had flipped: the Wall Street Journal reported that MGM itself was now discussing a bid for People Inc., the company that had just tried to buy it [1][19].
Nothing about that reversal has been confirmed by MGM. No filing, no statement, nothing beyond the WSJ's unnamed sources describes an actual offer. But the stock market reacted like it believed it anyway. On Friday, Sept. 25, People Inc. shares jumped more than 11%, closing at $40.05 [4]. MGM shares did the opposite, falling almost 3% to $32.72 — on top of an 11% drop the day before, when the withdrawal first hit [3][5][6].
That's the puzzle sitting at the center of this story. Diller says the deal fell apart because "the mix" of pieces wasn't "coming together" [2]. Two days later, the company he walked away from is reportedly sizing him up as a target. To understand why that isn't as strange as it sounds, you have to look at what each company actually owns — and what the market thinks that's worth.
The Math Nobody's Disputing
People Inc. still owns 66.8 million shares of MGM, about 27% of the whole company [9]. That stake alone is worth roughly what all of People Inc.'s stock is worth on the market [16][17]. Its magazine and website brands — Food & Wine, Southern Living, People itself — are, by that math, being priced by investors at close to zero.
That gap has a name: the "conglomerate discount." It shows up when a company owns a valuable piece of something else, but the market refuses to credit the parent for it, usually because investors don't trust the holding company to unlock that value on its own. For People Inc.'s shareholders, it means their stock is stuck below what their assets suggest it should be worth. For MGM, it means there's a company sitting right next to it whose entire market value could, in theory, be swallowed by MGM's own shares.
That's the logic behind a reverse bid. If MGM bought People Inc., it would effectively be buying back its own 27% stake at a discount, and picking up the magazine business for close to nothing in the process [16][17]. It reads like a bargain on paper. Whether it works in practice depends on things paper doesn't capture — like whether MGM, a casino and hotel operator, has any business running magazines.
Why the First Deal Died
Buying out MGM's public shareholders was never going to be simple math. The $18 billion price tag, including debt, meant People Inc. needed to borrow heavily and bring in outside investors willing to put up new equity [8]. Bloomberg reported that Diller had trouble raising that equity — the money from new investors that would have covered the gap between what he had and what the deal cost [10]. Quartz separately pointed to the debt load itself as a factor in the retreat [20].
Diller's own explanation stayed vague. He said the various "ingredients" of the deal didn't come together as "the mix," and left it there [2]. He didn't rule out trying again in some other form. People Inc.'s statement said the company remains "open to and interested in the possibility of a strategic transaction with MGM Resorts" [2][9] — language built to leave every door open, including the one MGM might now be walking through.
MGM's board, for its part, had already set up a special committee of independent directors back in July to review the original $48.30 offer on behalf of shareholders other than People Inc. [11]. That committee's work on the first deal is presumably moot now. But the infrastructure for weighing a big transaction involving these two companies is already in place, which may be part of why a reverse bid could move fast if it happens at all.
Three Audiences, Three Different Stories
MGM's own leadership isn't hedging in public. Speaking to gaming trade press, MGM's chairman said the board remains "excited to continue to lead MGM Resorts as a standalone company" [12]. That statement came out just two days before the WSJ's report of a possible reverse bid — a reminder that "standalone" and "considering an acquisition" aren't necessarily contradictory, since buying People Inc. would be about retiring MGM's own stock and picking up assets cheap, not merging into something bigger.
MGM's outside shareholders are watching a very different number: the stock price. They were offered $48.30 a share in June. Their shares now trade around $32.72, roughly a third below that offer [5][7]. Analysts tracked by Quartz rate MGM a "hold" on average, compared to "buy" ratings for competitors Las Vegas Sands and Wynn [20]. For these investors, the question isn't corporate strategy — it's whether any new deal, in either direction, gets them back to something like the price they were promised.
People Inc.'s shareholders are the ones who actually cheered. Their stock rose from $35.93 to $40.05 in a single day, a gain of $4.12 [4]. That's the market pricing in the chance that MGM finally closes the conglomerate discount by buying the company outright. If no bid materializes, trade coverage suggests that gain could just as easily reverse [16].
How the Story Got Told
The coverage of this reversal split less along the usual political lines and more along who each outlet was writing for. Straight business wires like Bloomberg and Reuters stuck close to the facts, crediting the WSJ by name in their own headlines and adding sourced detail — Bloomberg's reporting on Diller's equity troubles went beyond anything Diller said himself [1][10]. CNBC led with the checkable number: MGM's shares sinking 11% [3].
Entertainment and retail-investor outlets leaned harder into the drama. Deadline called it a "role-reversal" and said shares "surged" [14]. Benzinga's headline — "Barry Diller's Company Tried to Buy MGM. Now MGM May Buy It." — dropped any hint that this was an unconfirmed, single-source report [15]. Blockonomi went further, saying MGM's stock "plunges" for a drop under 3%, and stated the possible acquisition as settled fact [6].
Asian gaming trade press told a third version entirely. GGRAsia and Asia Gaming Brief centered MGM China, the company's Macau casino license, and led with MGM management's "excited" quote about staying independent [8][12]. Their framing reflects a real stake: analysts had suggested a completed takeover of MGM could have forced a sale of its Macau or Osaka assets [20]. With the original deal dead, that scenario is off the table, at least for now — though what happens if MGM does end up as the buyer instead of the target hasn't been mapped out anywhere yet.
Summary
On Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2026, People Inc. withdrew its offer to buy all the MGM Resorts International shares it did not already own[2]. People is the media company chaired by Barry Diller. It was once called IAC, and it owns magazine brands including People, Food & Wine and Southern Living[13]. The offer, first made June 1, was $48.30 a share in cash[7]. Counting debt, it valued MGM at more than $18 billion[8]. People keeps its 66.8 million MGM shares, about 27% of the casino company[9].
The next evening, the Wall Street Journal reported that MGM was discussing a bid for People Inc. The WSJ said an offer could come within days, according to Bloomberg and Reuters accounts of the report[1][19]. Neither company has publicly confirmed any talks. On Friday, Sept. 25, People Inc. shares rose more than 11% to close at $40.05[4]. MGM shares did not rise. Market reports said they fell almost 3% to $32.72[5][6]. That came after MGM sank about 11% on Thursday, when news of the withdrawal hit[3]. That $32.72 price is about a third below the $48.30 People had offered.
The main dispute is whether a reverse deal makes sense. Analysts quoted in trade coverage point out that People's whole stock-market value is about the same as its MGM stake alone[16][17]. By that logic, buying People would let MGM buy back a big block of its own shares cheaply and get the magazines nearly free. The case against is less direct. Just two days earlier, MGM said it was 'excited' to stay a standalone company[12]. And its shares fell, not rose, on the report[5]. Why Diller walked away is also only partly clear. His statement said the 'mix' was not 'coming together'[2]. Bloomberg reported that he had trouble raising equity[10]. Quartz cited the debt the deal would have created[20].
The Event
On Sept. 23, 2026, People Inc. said it had withdrawn its June 1 proposal to buy MGM Resorts' public shares for $48.30 each in cash[2][7]. MGM shares fell about 11% on Sept. 24[3]. That evening, the Wall Street Journal reported that MGM was discussing a bid for People Inc.[1][19]. On Sept. 25, People Inc. shares closed up more than 11% at $40.05, and MGM shares fell almost 3% to $32.72[4][5].
Undisputed Facts
- People Inc. proposed on June 1, 2026, to buy all MGM Resorts shares it did not already own for $48.30 a share in cash[7][8].
- The proposal valued MGM at more than $18 billion including debt[8].
- MGM's board formed a special committee of independent directors to review the offer, CEO Bill Hornbuckle said on the company's second-quarter earnings call[11].
- People Inc. withdrew the proposal on Sept. 23, 2026, and said it remains 'open to and interested in the possibility of a strategic transaction with MGM Resorts'[2][9].
- People Inc. still holds 66.8 million MGM shares, about 27% of the company[9].
- MGM said it will continue as a standalone company[8][12].
- MGM shares fell about 11% on Sept. 24 after the withdrawal[3].
- On Sept. 25, People Inc. shares rose more than 11% to $40.05, while MGM shares fell almost 3% to $32.72[4][5].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- The conglomerate discount
- A 'conglomerate discount' means the market values a holding company at less than the sum of what it owns. People's market value is about equal to its 27% MGM stake alone[16][17]. That implies investors give almost no value to its magazines and websites. This one fact explains both sides' moves. People's shareholders want the gap closed. MGM could buy People, get back its own shares below their stand-alone value, and gain the media brands almost for free. The risk for MGM is taking on businesses it has never run[1][16].
- Debt and equity limits
- Taking MGM private for more than $18 billion including debt required large new borrowing and outside equity[8]. Bloomberg reported that Diller had trouble raising that equity, and Quartz cited the deal's debt load as a factor in the withdrawal[10][20].
- The overhang of a 27% holder
- An 'overhang' is a large block of stock that could be sold at any time, which tends to hold a share price down. A holder that has just abandoned a buyout still owns 66.8 million MGM shares[9]. MGM has a reason to settle that uncertainty, and a buyout of the holder would do it[1].
Material realityNo offer from MGM exists in any public filing. The only confirmed facts are People's Sept. 23 withdrawal, its unchanged 27% stake, and two days of share moves: MGM down about 11% on Sept. 24 and almost 3% on Sept. 25, and People Inc. up more than 11% on Sept. 25[2][3][4][5]. MGM's operations are unchanged, including its Macau arm MGM China and its Osaka project[8][20].
Narrative as a weaponTwo sets of actors shape how this story is read. Unnamed people behind the WSJ report present a reverse bid as imminent. That reading has lifted People's stock, and it keeps pressure on MGM's board[1][4]. Diller's public statement is deliberately open-ended. It frames the withdrawal as prudence and leaves room for 'a range of alternatives'[2][9]. MGM's management, speaking to Asian trade press, stresses independence and confidence[12]. Retail-trading sites amplify the 'tables turned' drama. At least one assigned summary got the market reaction backward, saying MGM shares rose when they actually fell[5][6].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asDiller's case is that the discipline to walk away is itself good stewardship. In his words, a deal like this has 'lots of ingredients,' and when 'the mix' did not come together, People chose not to force it[2]. He has long called MGM undervalued. People says it still backs MGM's management and remains open to 'a range of alternatives'[9][12]. That includes a deal in either direction. Supporters say that keeps the value of the 27% stake in play for People's own shareholders[16].
WhyTo unlock value from the MGM stake. Analysts say the stock market barely credits People for anything beyond that stake[16][17]. People also wants to avoid the heavy debt a full buyout would have required[20].
Impact on themPeople's stock jumped more than 11% on the report of a possible MGM bid[4]. If MGM does bid, People's shareholders could be paid out and its magazine brands would end up inside a casino company. If no deal happens, People stays a media company with its value tied mostly to MGM's share price[16].
Frames it asMGM's leadership says the company is strong enough to go it alone. Its chairman said the group is 'excited' to remain standalone[12]. Its special committee reviewed the $48.30 offer on behalf of shareholders other than People[11]. Supporters of a reverse bid, cited in trade coverage, say buying People would work like a large, discounted share buyback. MGM would retire the 27% block of its own stock and gain lifestyle brands such as Food & Wine that could fit its hotels and restaurants[16][17].
WhyTo remove the uncertainty of a 27% holder that has just walked away from a buyout, and to do it on MGM's terms[1][16].
Impact on themMGM's stock lost about 11% when the buyout ended and slipped almost 3% more on the report of a reverse bid[3][5]. Buying People would mean taking on a media business far from casinos[1].
Frames it asThese investors lost the $48.30 cash price they had been offered. Their shares now trade near $32.72[5][7]. From their side, the question is whether any new deal gives them a real premium or just rearranges ownership. Analysts rate MGM a 'hold' on average, compared with 'buy' ratings for rivals Las Vegas Sands and Wynn, according to data Quartz cited[20].
WhyTo recover the value that disappeared with the withdrawn offer[3].
Impact on themThe drop on Sept. 24 wiped out about 11% of MGM's market value in one day[3]. Analysts had said a completed takeover could have led to a sale of MGM's MGM China stake or its Osaka interest[20]. Those plans are now off the table for now.
Frames it asAnalysts note that People's whole market value is about equal to its MGM stake alone, which suggests its publishing brands are being valued at close to zero[16][17]. From this view, an MGM bid would finally price in the magazines and digital businesses.
WhyA takeover premium that closes the gap between People's share price and the value of what it owns[4][16].
Impact on themShares rose from $35.93 to $40.05 on Sept. 25, a gain of $4.12[4]. That rise would likely reverse if no offer appears.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 3.4
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBC | U.S. center (business) | 2 | MGM Resorts shares sink 11% after Barry Diller's People Inc. rescinds takeover offer | It leads with the checkable share move and quotes Diller's statement. It is straight market reporting, and 'sink' is a routine verb for a double-digit drop. |
| Bloomberg | U.S. center (business) | 2 | MGM Resorts Is Discussing Making a Bid for People: WSJ | It credits the WSJ as the source in the headline. In its earlier story, it added reported detail that Diller 'had trouble raising' equity, which goes beyond his own vague explanation. |
| Reuters | International wire, center | 2 | MGM discusses bid for Barry Diller's People Inc, WSJ reports | It attributes carefully ('WSJ reports') and adds that People's roughly 27% stake is worth nearly as much as the whole company, which gives the deal logic without endorsing it. |
| GGRAsia | Macau-based gaming trade press | 3 | MGM Resorts chairman says group 'excited' to remain a standalone as People Inc drops takeover bid | It leads with MGM management's upbeat quote and frames MGM as the parent of Macau licensee MGM China. It gives the company's view prominence over the share-price loss. |
| Deadline | U.S. entertainment trade | 4 | Shares In Barry Diller's People Inc. Surge On Report Of Role-Reversal Acquisition Bid From MGM Resorts | The 'role-reversal' hook and the word 'surge' play up the drama. Still, it correctly makes People's stock, not MGM's, the one that rose. |
| Benzinga | U.S. retail-investor news | 5 | Barry Diller's Company Tried to Buy MGM. Now MGM May Buy It. | The narrative headline treats an unconfirmed, single-source report as a live storyline and drops 'reportedly' from the headline. |
| Blockonomi | U.S. crypto/retail-trading site | 6 | MGM Resorts (MGM) Stock Plunges as Casino Giant Considers Acquiring Barry Diller's People Inc | 'Plunges' is an overstatement for a drop of almost 3%. It also states 'considers' as fact without crediting the WSJ in the headline. |
References
- MGM Resorts Is Discussing Making a Bid for People: WSJ — Bloomberg · Business wire owned by Michael Bloomberg; center, market-focused
- People Incorporated Withdraws Proposal to Purchase All Public Shares of MGM Resorts International — PR Newswire (People Inc. press release) · Company statement; primary source with an interest in the outcome
- MGM Resorts shares sink 11% after Barry Diller's People Inc. rescinds takeover offer — CNBC · Comcast/NBCUniversal-owned business network; center
- People Inc (PPLI) Shares Jump Over 11% Amid Takeover Speculation Linked to MGM Resorts — GuruFocus · Investor data and news site; market-oriented
- People Incorporated shares rise over 10% on potential MGM takeover bid — Proactive Investors · Investor news site, partly funded by company-sponsored content
- MGM Resorts (MGM) Stock Plunges as Casino Giant Considers Acquiring Barry Diller's People Inc — Blockonomi · Crypto/retail-trading news site; traffic-driven headlines
- MGM Resorts: Barry Diller's People bids to buy casino giant — CNBC · Comcast/NBCUniversal-owned business network; center
- MGM Resorts to remain standalone as People Inc. withdraws takeover bid — Asia Gaming Brief · Asia-Pacific gaming industry trade press
- Diller ends MGM Resorts takeover bid but stays 'open' to other deals — Las Vegas Sun · Las Vegas local daily owned by the Greenspun family; center-left editorial page
- Barry Diller Drops Offer to Buy the Rest of MGM Resorts — Bloomberg · Business wire owned by Michael Bloomberg; center, market-focused
- MGM board forms special committee to review People Inc. takeover bid — FOX5 Vegas · Local TV news (Gray Media); center
- MGM Resorts chairman says group 'excited' to remain a standalone as People Inc drops takeover bid — GGRAsia · Macau-based gaming industry trade press
- People Inc. — Wikipedia · Crowd-edited encyclopedia; background only
- Shares In Barry Diller's People Inc. Surge On Report Of Role-Reversal Acquisition Bid From MGM Resorts — Deadline · Penske Media entertainment trade outlet
- Barry Diller's Company Tried to Buy MGM. Now MGM May Buy It. — Benzinga · Retail-investor news site; trading-oriented
- New report suggests MGM could bid for People Inc instead, after Diller rescinds offer — iGaming Business · Gambling-industry trade press (Clarion Gaming)
- Tables Turn In Las Vegas: Casino Giant MGM Resorts Considers Buying The Publisher That Tried To Buy It — Stocktwits · Retail-trader social platform news desk
- People Inc - Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1 — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR) · Regulatory filing by the company; primary source
- MGM discusses bid for Barry Diller's People Inc, WSJ reports — Reuters (via WTVB) · International wire service (Thomson Reuters); center
- Barry Diller's People Inc. withdraws $18 billion MGM Resorts bid — Quartz · U.S. business news site (G/O Media); center