CDC Reports 2,318 U.S. Measles Cases in 2026, Most Since 1991, With Five Months Left in the Year
South Carolina and Utah account for roughly half of this year's confirmed cases, as an international panel prepares to review whether the U.S. still qualifies as having eliminated measles.
2,318 Cases, and Five Months of the Year Left
On Friday, July 24, 2026, the CDC posted new measles data. It showed 2,318 confirmed cases in the United States so far this year[1][2]. That already tops the 2,289 cases recorded for all of 2025[1][5]. More than five months of 2026 remain[1][5].
It's the highest annual U.S. total since 1991[1][3]. It's also the second record year in a row[1][3].
Two states account for roughly half the cases. South Carolina has the most, with 670 confirmed cases in the same July 24 CDC dataset[1][24]. Utah is second, with 522[1][24]. Both outbreaks began in 2025 and carried into this year[1][10].
The CDC says 93% of this year's cases were in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown[1][4]. About 7% of patients needed hospital care — 151 out of 2,318[1][2]. No measles deaths have been reported in the U.S. so far in 2026[1][2]. Three people died of measles in 2025: two children and one adult[2][7].
Nobody disputes those numbers. What's contested is why the count climbed, and who should answer for it.
Cases Are Rising. A Different Number Is Falling.
Measles is the most contagious virus known to medicine[8][14]. One infected person typically spreads it to 12 to 18 unprotected people[8][14]. To stop a chain of infection on its own, a community needs roughly 95% immunity[8][14]. Below that line, a single imported case can keep spreading for months.
National kindergarten coverage for the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine sits at 92.5%, down from 95.2% in the 2019-20 school year[13][14]. Nonmedical exemptions — religious or personal-belief opt-outs — hit a record 4.1% of kindergartners in 2024-25, about 138,000 children[13][14]. The gap between 92.5% and the 95% threshold looks small on paper. In practice, it's the difference between an outbreak that fizzles out and one that runs for a year[13][14].
The national average also hides where the real risk sits. Coverage can look fine overall while one county, school or community sits far below it[12]. That's exactly where both of this year's large outbreaks took hold[12].
At the same time, a different pair of CDC numbers is moving the other way. The share of patients needing hospitalization fell from 11% last year to 7% this year[1][2]. Nobody has died of measles in the U.S. in 2026 so far[1][2]. Cases are up. By these two measures, severity is down. Both facts come from the same CDC dataset, and neither side has much reason to highlight the other's number.
Two Outbreaks That Started Before This Year
South Carolina's outbreak was centered in and around Spartanburg County. It was declared over in late April 2026[9][10]. Along the way, 33 schools reported exposures and 874 students were asked to quarantine over about six months[9][11].
Utah's outbreak runs along the Utah-Arizona state line and has been active for more than a year[1][25]. Roughly half of Utah's cases sit in the state's southwest health district, home to communities tied to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints[10]. Advocates for those communities point out there's no religious teaching against vaccination there — just historically low uptake[10].
Both outbreaks predate this year's fight over federal vaccine policy. That timing cuts both ways. It weakens the claim that this year's policy changes caused this year's record, since the outbreaks were already running in 2025[1][10]. It also weakens the claim that nothing structural is wrong, since a chain of infection surviving a full year is itself the problem regulators watch for.
The Committee That Controls the Money, and the Test Set for November
Much of the political fight is really a fight over one obscure federal panel: the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP[19][26]. ACIP's recommendations decide which vaccines insurers must cover at no cost, and which ones the federal Vaccines for Children program buys for uninsured kids[19][26]. Many state school vaccination rules are written to follow ACIP's list[19][26]. Changing who sits on that committee isn't symbolic — it moves money and school policy.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced ACIP members after taking office[19][26]. Since then, the committee has struggled to gather enough members for a quorum to make any recommendation at all[19][26]. In March 2026, a federal judge blocked part of Kennedy's broader vaccine-schedule overhaul, finding the process behind it "arbitrary and capricious"[17]. Oregon's attorney general and other states have sued over the same changes[18].
A separate, fixed date is already on the calendar. In November 2026, the Pan American Health Organization's Regional Verification Commission is set to decide whether the U.S. and Mexico still meet the standard for measles elimination[6]. That standard isn't about the case count at all. It asks one narrow question: has a single genetic lineage of the virus circulated continuously in the country for 12 months or more[6][7]? Genetic sequencing lets investigators tell whether new cases descend from an existing domestic chain or a fresh import from abroad.
The Americas region already lost its own verification in November 2025, after investigators found the virus had circulated in Canada for at least a year[7]. The Utah-Arizona outbreak has already run longer than that[1][25]. An independent analysis published earlier this year concluded the U.S. is "highly likely" to lose its own elimination status this fall[8].
How Each Side Reads the Same Number
Democratic officials, many public health researchers and most national outlets read 2,318 as a scorecard on Kennedy. The New Republic stated it as settled fact in its headline: "RFK Jr. Now Responsible for 35-Year Record High in Measles"[23]. Their case leans on the ACIP disruption, the court's "arbitrary and capricious" ruling, and the exemption and coverage data — real numbers, even where the causal claim is contested[13][14][17][23].
HHS disputes that the record belongs to Kennedy alone. A department spokesperson said Kennedy "has been clear that vaccination remains the most effective way to prevent measles infection," and pointed to more than $8.5 million sent to states and local partners, plus CDC staff surged to outbreak areas[13]. Kennedy has separately said, repeatedly, that "if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it"[16]. His allies argue mandates push already-distrustful communities away from the health system entirely, and that falling hospitalizations and zero deaths show the response is working even as cases climb[1][2][16].
Medical-freedom advocates and families in the affected communities frame this as a fight over consent, not disease. Their strongest point isn't medical — it's that a parent accepting a small personal risk is exercising the same authority the law already gives parents over other medical decisions. In South Carolina's outbreak, 95.3% of patients were unvaccinated and 90.8% were 17 or younger[9]: families making a choice for their own kids, as they see it, not imposing risk on strangers. Litigation to restore religious and personal-belief exemptions in states that repealed them is already underway[19][29].
Health agencies say the rights debate obscures a cost that isn't abstract. Containing an outbreak is expensive even when nobody dies — South Carolina alone quarantined 874 students across 33 schools over six months[9][11]. Agencies also want to preserve the U.S. elimination designation, both as a measure of their own performance and to protect immunization funding during a period of federal reorganization[8][26].
Internationally, PAHO applies the same 12-month test to every country, and says its credibility depends on applying it consistently[6][7]. It frames the U.S. as one part of a hemisphere-wide surge: as of November 2025, ten countries in the Americas had reported 12,596 confirmed cases combined, roughly 30 times the 2024 total, with 28 deaths — 23 in Mexico, three in the U.S., two in Canada[7].
The Same Numbers, Read Differently by Outlet
Coverage of the July 24 data split sharply along familiar lines. CNN and The Washington Post led with the record and moved quickly to falling vaccination rates and the elimination review; the Post's version ran three days ahead of CDC's own posting, built on the Johns Hopkins tracker, with "months left in 2026" doing editorial work of its own[1][3][5]. The New Republic went further, presenting Kennedy's personal responsibility as fact rather than a contested claim[23]. Further left, the World Socialist Web Site described federal vaccine policy as an "assault," language that leaves little room for a good-faith version of the consent argument[27].
On the right, One America News Network and Just the News ran short, data-only items built around the CDC figure and the 1991 comparison[21][22]. Neither connected the numbers to falling MMR coverage or to Kennedy's policy changes — an absence that functions as its own kind of position. Al Jazeera, drawing on PAHO, treated the U.S. as one of three affected countries alongside Canada and Mexico, largely setting aside the American political fight[20]. CIDRAP, a university-run public health outlet, led with the "highly likely" elimination forecast rather than the case count, treating vaccination decline as the operative cause without framing it as contested[8].
None of that coverage changes what happens in November. The Regional Verification Commission won't be tallying up to 2,318 when it meets[6]. It will be asking whether one chain of the virus has now circulated in the U.S. continuously for a full year. Along the Utah-Arizona line, it already has[1][25].
Summary
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention posted updated measles data on Friday, July 24, 2026. It showed 2,318 confirmed cases in the United States so far this year[1][2]. That is more than the 2,289 cases recorded in all of 2025, and there are still more than five months left in the year[1][5]. It is the highest annual total since 1991 — a 35-year high, and the second record year in a row[1][3].
Two states account for about half the total. South Carolina has reported the most cases at 670, and Utah is second at 522, based on the CDC's July 24 dataset[1][24]. Both grew out of outbreaks that began in 2025. South Carolina's was centered in Spartanburg County and was declared over in late April 2026[9][10]. Utah's runs along the Utah-Arizona state line and has been going for more than a year[1][25]. The CDC says 93% of this year's cases were in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown[1][4].
Nobody seriously disputes the count. The fight is over what caused it and who should answer for it. Public health researchers, many Democratic state officials and most mainstream outlets point to falling childhood vaccination and to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s changes to federal vaccine policy[13][17][23]. HHS says Kennedy has been clear that vaccination is the most effective way to prevent measles, and that the department has sent more than $8.5 million to states and surged CDC staff to outbreak areas[13]. Kennedy has also repeatedly said the government should not force anyone to vaccinate[16]. Vaccine-choice advocates lean on a different set of CDC numbers: no measles deaths have been reported in the U.S. in 2026 so far, and the share of cases needing hospitalization fell from 11% last year to 7% this year[1][2].
The next fixed date is November 2026. That is when the Pan American Health Organization's Regional Verification Commission is scheduled to review whether the United States and Mexico still meet the standard for measles elimination[6]. The Americas as a region already lost that verification in November 2025, after the virus was found to have circulated continuously in Canada for at least 12 months[7]. An analysis published earlier this year concluded the U.S. is 'highly likely' to lose its own status this fall[8].
The Event
On Friday, July 24, 2026, the CDC posted data showing 2,318 confirmed measles cases in the United States in 2026[1][2]. That figure exceeds the 2,289 cases reported for all of 2025 and is the highest annual U.S. total since 1991[1][3]. South Carolina leads with 670 cases and Utah follows with 522, together making up roughly half the national total[1][24]. The CDC reported that 93% of 2026 cases were in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown, that 151 of the 2,318 patients — about 7% — were hospitalized, and that no measles deaths have been reported in the U.S. so far this year[1][2][4].
Undisputed Facts
- The CDC reported 2,318 confirmed U.S. measles cases in 2026 as of its July 24 data posting, exceeding the 2,289 cases reported for all of 2025[1][2].
- That total is the highest for any year since 1991, and the highest since the U.S. declared measles eliminated in 2000[3][5].
- South Carolina (670 cases) and Utah (522 cases) together account for more than half of the 2026 national total, based on the CDC's July 24 dataset[1][24].
- The CDC reports that 93% of 2026 cases occurred in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown[1][4].
- About 7% of 2026 cases — 151 of 2,318 — required hospitalization, down from 11% (243 of 2,289) in 2025, and no U.S. measles deaths have been reported in 2026 as of late July[1][2].
- Three people died of measles in the U.S. in 2025: two children and one adult[2][7].
- Kindergarten MMR vaccination coverage fell from 95.2% in the 2019-20 school year to 92.5% in 2024-25, and nonmedical exemptions rose to a record 4.1% of kindergartners — about 138,000 children — in 2024-25[13][14].
- In November 2025, PAHO's Regional Verification Commission determined the Americas region had lost its verification as free of endemic measles, citing at least 12 months of continuous transmission in Canada; it scheduled its review of U.S. and Mexican status for November 2026[6][7].
- In March 2026, a federal judge blocked changes Kennedy made to federal childhood vaccine policy, finding the process 'arbitrary and capricious'[17].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- The 95% threshold is arithmetic, not politics
- Measles spreads more efficiently than any other known human virus. One case typically produces 12 to 18 more among unprotected people. That ratio sets the immunity level needed to stop a chain on its own at roughly 95%[8][14]. National kindergarten MMR coverage is 92.5%[13][14]. The gap is small on paper and decisive in practice — and because coverage is not spread evenly, a national average in the low 90s hides counties and congregations far below it. That is where both 2026 outbreaks took hold[12].
- Elimination status is a calendar test, and the clock is already running
- The Regional Verification Commission does not judge how many cases a country has. It asks whether a single genetic lineage of the virus has circulated for 12 straight months[6][7]. The Utah-Arizona border outbreak has been going for more than a year[1][25]. That single fact matters more to the November decision than the headline number of 2,318, and it is largely outside the control of whoever runs HHS today.
- Both large outbreaks predate this year's policy fight
- South Carolina's outbreak and Utah's outbreak both started in 2025 and carried into 2026[1][10]. The calendar-year record is partly an artifact of when a long-running outbreak happens to cross January 1. This cuts against the cleanest version of each side's story — it weakens 'this year's policy caused this year's record,' and it also weakens 'nothing structural is wrong,' since chains that survive a year are the definition of the structural problem.
- Severity and incidence are moving in opposite directions
- Cases went up. Hospitalization share went down, from 11% to 7%, and no deaths have been reported in 2026 as of late July[1][2]. Both facts are from the same CDC dataset. Neither camp has a strong incentive to explain the other's number, so readers mostly see one or the other.
- Control of ACIP is the real prize
- The advisory committee's recommendations determine what insurers must cover without cost-sharing and what the federal Vaccines for Children program purchases; many state school rules reference the same list[19][26]. Whoever controls the committee controls the plumbing of childhood immunization — which is why the fight over its membership has generated litigation while the case count generates headlines[17][18][26].
Material realityThe measles virus does not respond to framing. It requires roughly 95% population immunity to stop circulating, and U.S. kindergarten MMR coverage is 92.5% and falling, with nonmedical exemptions at a record 4.1%[13][14]. Two multi-month outbreaks — one in and around Spartanburg County, South Carolina, one along the Utah-Arizona line — produced roughly half of this year's 2,318 confirmed cases[1][9][24]. About 93% of patients were unvaccinated or of unknown status[1][4]. Containment has real costs regardless of who is right: 33 schools with exposures and 874 students quarantined in South Carolina alone[9][11]. The November PAHO review will turn on one narrow question — whether a single viral chain has circulated in the U.S. for 12 continuous months — and the Utah-Arizona outbreak has already been going longer than that[1][6][25]. The Americas region lost its collective measles-free verification in November 2025 over Canada, so the U.S. decision does not stand alone[7]. And measles immunity, once lost at the community level, takes years of steady vaccination to rebuild; no administration can restore it inside a single news cycle or a single term.
Narrative as a weaponThree groups are actively shaping how this number is read. Democratic officials, public health institutions and most large national outlets want you to read 2,318 as a scorecard on Secretary Kennedy — the causal chain runs policy change to falling coverage to record cases, and the strongest evidence for it is the exemption and coverage data plus a federal judge's March ruling that the vaccine-schedule overhaul was 'arbitrary and capricious'[13][14][17]. HHS and its allies want you to read the same number as a legacy problem being competently managed: outbreaks that started in 2025, zero deaths, hospitalizations down from 11% to 7%, $8.5 million pushed out to states[1][2][13]. Medical-freedom advocates want you to read it as a story about consent rather than about disease, and they benefit when coverage describes affected families as reckless rather than as religious minorities with their own reasons[10][19]. Right-leaning news outlets have mostly declined to fight on this terrain at all, reporting the CDC figure plainly and omitting the policy context — an absence that functions as a position[21][22]. Meanwhile, the fact with the clearest near-term consequence gets the least attention in all of it: the November elimination review does not care about the record. It cares whether one chain of virus has been circulating for twelve months, and along the Utah-Arizona line, it has[1][6][25].
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asMeasles is the most contagious virus known to medicine, and that fact drives everything else. One infected person will typically infect 12 to 18 unprotected people. That is why the protective threshold is so high: roughly 95% of a community must be immune before a chain of infection dies out on its own[8][14]. Below that line, a single imported case can keep spreading for months. Agencies argue this is why a drop from 95.2% to 92.5% coverage is not a small statistical wobble — it is the difference between outbreaks that fizzle and outbreaks that run for a year[13][14]. They also argue the averages hide the real danger. National coverage can look acceptable while a single county or congregation sits far below it, and that is exactly where the 2026 outbreaks happened[12]. Health officials say containment is expensive and disruptive even when nobody dies: in South Carolina, 33 schools had exposures and 874 students were asked to quarantine over six months[9][11].
WhyAgencies are judged on whether outbreaks stop. They also want to preserve the U.S. elimination designation, which is a direct measure of their own program's performance, and to protect funding and staffing for immunization programs during a period of federal reorganization[8][26].
Impact on themState health departments absorb the cost of contact tracing, quarantine enforcement and emergency clinics. CDC has surged personnel to outbreak areas[13]. A loss of elimination status in November would be a public and permanent mark against the agency's core mission[6][8].
Frames it asHHS says it is doing outbreak response and honoring consent at the same time, and that these are not in conflict. An HHS spokesperson said Kennedy 'has been clear that vaccination remains the most effective way to prevent measles infection,' and pointed to more than $8.5 million sent to states and local partners plus surged CDC staff[13]. Kennedy's own stated principle is informed choice: 'if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it'[16]. His allies argue that trust, not compulsion, is the binding constraint — that mandates in communities already suspicious of the government drive families away from the whole health system, not just one shot. They also argue the outcome data deserve weight: hospitalizations fell from 11% of cases to 7%, and no one has died of measles in the U.S. this year[1][2]. On that reading, the response is working even as the case count rises.
WhyKennedy came into office promising to re-examine the childhood vaccine schedule and to loosen what he describes as coercive public health policy[15][19]. He needs to show he can run an outbreak response without abandoning that promise — and without conceding that his own policy changes caused the record.
Impact on themThe record is being used directly against him. Democratic officials and left-leaning outlets frame the 2026 number as his personal record[23]. A March 2026 federal court ruling blocked his vaccine-schedule changes as 'arbitrary and capricious,' and CDC's vaccine advisory committee has struggled to hold a quorum[17][26]. Losing elimination status in November would land during his tenure.
Frames it asThis side says the dispute is not really about measles — it is about who decides what goes into a child's body. Their strongest argument is a consent argument, not a medical one: a parent who accepts a small personal risk is exercising the same authority the law gives parents over every other medical decision. They point out that most people in these outbreaks recover at home. In 2026, 93% of cases required no hospitalization, and none have been fatal so far[1][2]. They also object to how the affected groups are described. Roughly half of Utah's cases are in the southwest Utah health district, home to Fundamentalist Latter-day Saints communities[10]. Advocates argue these are religious minorities with long histories of state intervention against them, and that quarantine orders and school exclusion land on them as coercion, not care. Their legal argument is that religious and personal-belief exemptions are civil rights, and litigation to restore them in states that repealed them is ongoing[19][29].
WhyTo convert a moment of maximum public attention into durable legal protection — locking exemption rights into state statutes and, if possible, federal constitutional precedent, before a future administration reverses federal policy again[19][29].
Impact on themThese are the communities that get sick. South Carolina's outbreak data showed 95.3% of patients unvaccinated and 90.8% aged 17 or younger[9]. Children in these families face quarantine, missed school and, for a small share, hospitalization. They also face intense public blame in national coverage.
Frames it asTheir case is that a policy change was made, and a measurable harm followed. They point to a specific mechanism, not just a correlation. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — ACIP — is the panel whose recommendations decide which vaccines insurers must cover for free and which the federal Vaccines for Children program buys for uninsured kids. Many state school requirements are written to track ACIP's list. So changing ACIP is not a symbolic act; it moves money and school rules. Kennedy replaced members of that committee, and it has since had trouble reaching a quorum to make any recommendation at all[19][26]. A federal judge blocked part of the overhaul in March 2026 as 'arbitrary and capricious,' meaning the court found the decisions ignored the established scientific process[17]. Oregon's attorney general and other states sued over the same changes[18]. This camp argues that when the country's vaccine authority stops speaking clearly, uptake falls — and the exemption and coverage numbers show it did[13][14].
WhyState attorneys general and Democratic officials are pursuing both a policy goal — reversing the federal changes in court — and a political one, since vaccine policy has become a reliable line of attack heading into the fall[18][19].
Impact on themBlue-state health departments must decide whether to keep following federal recommendations they are simultaneously suing over. Insurers and pediatricians face uncertainty about what is covered when ACIP cannot act[26].
Frames it asPAHO's position is that elimination is a technical status with a fixed definition, and it applies the same test to everyone. The test is this: has any single chain of the virus circulated continuously in the country for 12 months or longer? Genetic sequencing lets investigators tell whether new cases descend from an existing domestic chain or from a fresh import. If one chain survives a full year, endemic transmission is considered re-established, and elimination is lost. That is precisely what the commission found in Canada in November 2025, which cost the entire Americas region its verification[7]. PAHO frames the U.S. situation as part of a hemisphere-wide problem: as of November 2025, ten countries had reported 12,596 confirmed cases, about a 30-fold jump from 2024, with 28 deaths — 23 in Mexico, 3 in the U.S., 2 in Canada[7]. Its remedy is not punishment but coverage: get every district above the threshold[20].
WhyPAHO's credibility rests on applying the elimination standard consistently, including to wealthy member states. Softening it for the U.S. would undermine every other country's certification.
Impact on themThe commission's November 2026 meeting will formally review U.S. and Mexican status[6]. An independent analysis concluded the U.S. is 'highly likely' to lose it[8]. The practical consequence is mostly reputational and diplomatic — there is no penalty or sanction — but it changes travel advisories and how other countries treat U.S. outbreaks.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.1
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 2 | 'UN agency warns of "sharp increase" in measles cases in the Americas' — regional framing, sourced to PAHO rather than to U.S. politics. | The U.S. appears as one of several affected countries, alongside Canada and Mexico. That de-centers the American political fight almost entirely. It is defensible on the record — the Americas lost regional status over Canada, not the U.S. — but it also means readers get little sense of the domestic policy dispute driving U.S. coverage. |
| CIDRAP | U.S. academic — University of Minnesota, funded by grants and institutional support; staffed by infectious-disease researchers | 2 | 'US "highly likely" to lose measles elimination status this fall, analysis warns' — leads with a modeled forecast rather than the case count. | Careful and heavily sourced, but the outlet's institutional position is squarely inside public health. It reports vaccination-coverage decline as the operative cause without treating that as a contested question. 'Warns' in the headline carries an advocacy note that the underlying analysis does not require. |
| CNN | U.S. center-left | 3 | 'US measles cases reach 35-year high, for second record-breaking year in a row' — leads with the CDC count, then moves quickly to vaccination decline and the elimination-status review. | The phrase 'second record-breaking year in a row' does real framing work: it turns a single data point into a trend line pointing at the current administration. The vaccination-status figure (93% unvaccinated or unknown) is prominent; the falling hospitalization rate and zero deaths get less emphasis. |
| The Washington Post | U.S. center-left | 3 | 'U.S. measles cases hit 35-year record with months left in 2026' — emphasizes that the record was set with the year only half over. | Ran on July 21, three days ahead of CDC's own posting, using the Johns Hopkins tracker. Choosing the faster non-government tracker over the official count is a defensible news decision, but it also puts the paper ahead of the agency it is implicitly critiquing. 'With months left' is an editorial judgment embedded in a headline. |
| One America News Network | U.S. right | 3 | 'CDC: 2026 Measles cases surpassed number of cases in 2025' — a flat, procedural framing that attributes the whole story to the agency. | Bias by omission, not by adjective. The word 'record' is avoided in favor of the narrower 'surpassed.' Falling vaccination rates, record exemptions, HHS policy changes and the November elimination review are not the focus. Readers get the number without the argument attached to it. |
| Just The News | U.S. right | 3 | 'U.S. measles cases in 2026, the highest since 1991, according to new CDC data' — attributes the claim to CDC in the headline itself. | 'According to new CDC data' is a hedge structure. It reports the figure accurately while quietly signaling that this is the government's number rather than an established fact. The site was founded by former Fox News and Washington Times journalist John Solomon; the framing avoids assigning cause to any federal official. |
| The New Republic | U.S. left | 8 | 'RFK Jr. Now Responsible for 35-Year Record High in Measles' — states personal causation as fact in the headline. | 'Responsible for' converts a contested causal claim into an asserted one. The piece's supporting figures are accurate — 2,318 versus 2,289 versus 283 in 2024, and the observation that the past 18 months saw more measles cases than the previous 25 years combined. But it does not engage the counter-evidence at all: no 2026 deaths, hospitalization share down from 11% to 7%, and the fact that both large outbreaks began in 2025 in communities with pre-existing low coverage. |
| World Socialist Web Site | Trotskyist (International Committee of the Fourth International) | 9 | 'Kennedy deepens assault on the childhood vaccine schedule' — frames federal vaccine policy as a deliberate attack. | Openly ideological language: 'assault,' and the claim that the administration 'frames disease prevention as a matter of personal and parental preference rather than a collective social necessity.' The underlying factual point about the shift to 'shared clinical decision-making' is real and verifiable; the vocabulary around it is advocacy, and the piece does not acknowledge any good-faith version of the consent argument. |
References
- US measles cases reach 35-year high, for second record-breaking year in a row — CNN · U.S. center-left, commercial cable/digital network
- U.S. measles cases hit 35-year record in 2026 at more than 2,300 confirmed cases — NBC News · U.S. center-left, Comcast-owned broadcast network
- U.S. measles cases hit 35-year record with months left in 2026 — The Washington Post · U.S. center-left newsroom; owned by Jeff Bezos
- Measles Cases and Outbreaks — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · U.S. federal government agency under HHS; the primary official dataset, currently led by an administration that is itself party to the dispute
- 2026 U.S. Measles Cases Surpass 2025 Level, Highest Since Declared Eliminated in 2000 — International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · U.S. academic vaccine-access center; institutionally pro-vaccination, funded by Gates Foundation and Gavi among others
- Measles elimination status in the United States and Mexico — Pan American Health Organization · Intergovernmental body; WHO regional office for the Americas, funded by member-state assessments
- PAHO calls for regional action as the Americas lose measles elimination status — Pan American Health Organization · Intergovernmental body; WHO regional office for the Americas
- US 'highly likely' to lose measles elimination status this fall, analysis warns — CIDRAP · University of Minnesota research center; grant-funded, institutionally aligned with mainstream infectious-disease public health
- South Carolina measles outbreak ends as US cases near 1,800 — CIDRAP · University of Minnesota research center; grant-funded public health outlet
- South Carolina measles outbreak declared over; Utah reaches 625 cases — American Hospital Association · U.S. hospital industry trade association; lobbies for member hospitals
- The measles outbreak in South Carolina is over but more are starting elsewhere — NPR · U.S. center-left public radio; member-station dues, sponsorship and foundation funding
- Largest U.S. measles outbreak in decades began with just four households, records reveal — Healthbeat · Nonprofit public health newsroom (Civic News Company / KFF partnership); philanthropically funded, public-health-oriented
- Childhood vaccine exemption rates hit record high, CDC data shows — NBC News · U.S. center-left broadcast network
- Kindergarten Routine Vaccination Rates Continue to Decline — KFF · U.S. health policy nonprofit; endowment-funded, generally aligned with mainstream public health, historically Democratic-leaning policy staff
- A Timeline of RFK Jr.'s Mixed Messaging on the Measles Vaccine — FactCheck.org · Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania; university-funded fact-checker, critical of vaccine-skeptic claims
- U.S. Health Secretary Kennedy renews backing for vaccination 'freedom of choice' — Tennessee Lookout · Nonprofit state newsroom in the States Newsroom network; left-of-center funding base
- Federal judge halts RFK Jr.'s changes to children's vaccine policies — NPR · U.S. center-left public radio
- Attorney General Rayfield Files Lawsuit Challenging the Kennedy Vaccine Schedule and Unlawful Overhaul of Federal Childhood Immunization Policy — Oregon Department of Justice · Office of a Democratic state attorney general; a party to the litigation it describes
- Kennedy allies target statehouses for next round of vaccine rollbacks — STAT · U.S. health and biotech trade publication owned by Boston Globe Media; industry-facing, generally pro-mainstream-medicine
- UN agency warns of 'sharp increase' in measles cases in the Americas — Al Jazeera · Qatari state-funded international broadcaster
- CDC: 2026 Measles cases surpassed number of cases in 2025 — One America News Network · U.S. right, pro-Trump cable network owned by the Herring family
- U.S. measles cases in 2026, the highest since 1991, according to new CDC data — Just The News · U.S. right; founded by John Solomon, formerly of Fox News and The Washington Times
- RFK Jr. Now Responsible for 35-Year Record High in Measles — The New Republic · U.S. left, opinion-forward political magazine
- US measles cases reach 35-year high, for second record-breaking year in a row — KSL · Utah broadcaster owned by Deseret Management, a subsidiary of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; carrying CNN wire content
- Utah measles outbreak tops 600 cases, now most active in the US — CIDRAP · University of Minnesota research center; grant-funded public health outlet
- Still no ACIP quorum, collapsing lawsuits, and vaccine questions answered: The State of US Vaccine Policy — CIDRAP · University of Minnesota research center; grant-funded public health outlet
- Kennedy deepens assault on the childhood vaccine schedule — World Socialist Web Site · Trotskyist; published by the International Committee of the Fourth International
- Measles – Region of the Americas (Disease Outbreak News) — World Health Organization · UN specialized agency; member-state and foundation funded
- Courts may deliver the anti-vaccine movement's biggest win — The Washington Post · U.S. center-left newsroom