Zelensky Says Ukraine, U.S. and Russia Negotiators Will Meet in First Half of November; Kremlin Says Talks Can Resume After Nov. 10
Zelensky said land questions can only be settled by leaders and ruled out limits on Ukraine's army or a neutral status, after Moscow and Kyiv each told U.S. envoys Witkoff and Kushner they are ready to talk again.
Two time frames, one meeting that hasn't been scheduled
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says negotiators from Ukraine, the United States and Russia will meet in the first half of November. He said so on Oct. 23, after a call with U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner [1][2]. Russia has named a different starting point.
Two days earlier, Witkoff met Russian President Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg. The meeting lasted about three hours. Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said afterward that Putin agreed "in principle" to resume three-way talks after Nov. 10 [6][7].
Put the two together and you get a rough window from Nov. 10 to mid-November. That is the editors' inference. Neither side has named exact dates.
The venue is also open. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov named Abu Dhabi [13]. Ukrainian reporting said the location was still being discussed [3].
A process that has stalled before
The three countries have done this before. They held three rounds earlier in 2026: two in Abu Dhabi and one in Geneva. Those rounds produced little beyond prisoner-of-war exchanges [6][22].
This round would start with negotiating teams, not presidents. Zelensky said a meeting of leaders could follow if the teams make progress [1]. He also said Ukraine is ready to meet "any day, even tomorrow." On his account, any delay comes from Moscow [1][2].
The lead-up began in Oslo. On Oct. 20, Witkoff met Zelensky and the leaders of Norway and Finland. Kushner joined remotely [9][20]. A U.S. official called the talks "very productive and constructive." The official pointed to a framework covering security guarantees, a postwar economic plan and European security [16].
What the talks are for
Both sides say they will talk. They disagree on what the talks are about.
On Oct. 25, Zelensky drew his lines. Territory, he said, "can only be discussed at the level of leaders." Limits on Ukraine's army and Ukrainian neutrality "are not up for discussion" [3][15]. He added that Washington had repeatedly raised a "territorial exchange," which Kyiv rejects [3]. Kyiv also plans to keep an active force of 800,000 if funding allows [4].
Moscow describes the agenda differently. Peskov said the talks will focus on postwar security for Russia and Ukraine [13]. Ushakov called it "building a security system for Russia and Ukraine" [6]. Neutrality and military limits sit inside that frame, and Moscow points to the 2022 Istanbul talks, where Ukraine discussed neutrality in exchange for guarantees [23]. Kyiv rejects those terms now.
Ushakov was also guarded about the Oslo proposals. He said they held "little of real value" and that Moscow is not "fully satisfied" with them [7]. Fortune's report adds that he also called them "a step in the right direction" [7].
Why each side holds its ground
Kyiv's case starts from memory. It says it gave up security before and was invaded anyway. A small army and a neutral status, it argues, would leave Ukraine open to a third invasion. To Kyiv, its army is the one guarantee that can't be withdrawn. On land, Zelensky argues that only elected leaders can decide a country's borders [3][4]. Conceding land or neutrality would also be very hard to sell at home [3].
Moscow says the war is about the security order on its border, not only about land. It argues any lasting deal must answer its concern about a Western-armed Ukraine. It also says European security can't be settled by three countries alone [13]. Russia has its own stake too. It has gained from eased U.S. sanctions, including relief on diesel exports. If talks stall and Washington tightens pressure, it risks more sanctions [9][12].
European partners have a different interest. Finland shares a long border with Russia. Any deal that changes Ukraine's military status shapes the threat on their doorstep. So Norway and Finland want a seat at the table and a deal not struck over their heads [19][20].
Washington's leverage and its critics
The talks arrive amid open friction between Kyiv and Washington. Ukraine accused the U.S. of holding back weapons and technology as leverage. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the charge "scandalous." He said "nothing" is "being deliberately denied to Ukraine" [10].
The two sides gave different accounts of what is being delivered. Zelensky said intelligence sharing was restored after Oslo. Ukraine also accused the Pentagon of failing to deliver interceptors [11][16].
The administration's view is that a long war of attrition helps no one. It argues that only a deal both sides accept will end the killing, and that mediating means pressing both parties. Trump has said he does not "care how it's done" as long as the war ends [12]. The administration also wants to cut open-ended U.S. costs [9][12].
Critics come from opposite directions. Supporters of Ukraine argue that pressing Kyiv while easing sanctions on Moscow rewards aggression [10]. Skeptics of aid on the right say the war is Europe's problem and that Americans "just get the bill" [18].
Same story, different emphasis
Outlets chose different centers of gravity. NBC News and CNBC led with U.S.-Ukraine tension. NBC's headline stressed Washington's rebuke of Kyiv's "scandalous" charge, and CNBC wrote of "tensions with Trump" rising [9][10]. In those accounts, Russia's demands come second.
Al Jazeera put Trump's "I don't care how it's done" in its headline, which makes Washington's pressure on Kyiv the story [12]. China's CGTN used a symmetric "all three signal" framing that plays down Kyiv's red lines [14]. Ukrainian outlets such as the Kyiv Post led with Zelensky's conditions and said little of Russia's agenda [4]. Fortune kept the Kremlin's own hedges in its headline [7]. The fringe-right Dissenter, in an opinion piece, framed it around cost to Americans [18].
Searches found little straight news coverage from major right-leaning U.S. outlets, so that view is thinly represented here.
What happens next is still open. Dates, venue and agenda are all unsettled. Kyiv says key Russian aims are off the table, and Moscow says it isn't fully satisfied. Whether the teams can bridge that gap is what the November meeting would test.
Summary
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says negotiators from Ukraine, the United States and Russia will meet in the first half of November [1][2]. He said this on Oct. 23 after a call with President Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner [1][2]. Two days earlier, Witkoff met Russian President Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg. Putin's adviser Yuri Ushakov said afterward that Putin agreed 'in principle' to resume three-way talks after Nov. 10 [6][7]. Read together, the two time frames suggest a window of roughly Nov. 10 to mid-November. That is the editors' inference, and neither side has named exact dates. Peskov named Abu Dhabi as the venue [13], while Ukrainian reporting said it was still being discussed [3].
The three sides last met early this year: twice in Abu Dhabi and once in Geneva. Those rounds produced little beyond prisoner-of-war exchanges [6][22]. This round would start with negotiating teams, not presidents. Zelensky said a meeting of leaders could follow if the teams make progress [1].
The main dispute is over what the talks are for. On Oct. 25, Zelensky said territory 'can only be discussed at the level of leaders.' He said limits on Ukraine's army and Ukrainian neutrality 'are not up for discussion' [3][15]. He said Washington had repeatedly raised a 'territorial exchange,' which Kyiv rejects [3]. The Kremlin describes the talks as 'building a security system for Russia and Ukraine' after the war [6][13]. Moscow presents neutrality and military limits as belonging to that agenda, citing the 2022 Istanbul talks [23], while Kyiv rejects them. Ushakov said the proposals from the Oslo meeting held 'little of real value,' and also that Moscow is not 'fully satisfied' with them [7].
The talks come during open friction between Kyiv and Washington. Ukraine accused the U.S. of holding back weapons and technology as leverage, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio called that charge 'scandalous' [10]. The U.S. has also eased some sanctions on Russia, including on diesel exports [9]. U.S. sanctions and aid policy are therefore part of what the talks decide.
The Event
On Oct. 20, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff met Zelensky and the leaders of Norway and Finland in Oslo. Jared Kushner joined remotely [9][20]. On Oct. 21, Witkoff met Putin in St. Petersburg for about three hours, and the Kremlin said Putin agreed 'in principle' to resume three-way talks after Nov. 10 [6][8]. On Oct. 23, Zelensky said the three negotiating teams would meet in the first half of November [1][2]. On Oct. 25, he set out his limits on territory, army size and neutrality [3][5].
Undisputed Facts
- Witkoff met Zelensky and Norwegian and Finnish leaders in Oslo on Oct. 20, and Kushner took part remotely [9][20].
- Witkoff met Putin in St. Petersburg on Oct. 21, and Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said Putin agreed 'in principle' to resume three-way talks after Nov. 10 [6][7].
- Zelensky said after a call with Witkoff and Kushner that team-level talks are planned for the first half of November [1][2].
- Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the talks are set for the first half of November in Abu Dhabi and will focus on postwar security for Russia and Ukraine [13].
- The three countries held three rounds of talks earlier in 2026, in Abu Dhabi and Geneva, with little progress beyond prisoner-of-war exchanges [6][22].
- Zelensky said limits on Ukraine's army and neutrality are not up for discussion and that territory can only be discussed by leaders [3][15].
- Secretary of State Rubio called Kyiv's accusation that the U.S. withdrew support 'scandalous' and said 'nothing' is 'being deliberately denied to Ukraine' [10].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- Ukraine's security deficit
- Kyiv sees its army as the only guarantee that cannot be withdrawn. So it treats army limits and neutrality as existential issues, not bargaining chips [3][4].
- Russia's security-architecture demand
- Moscow frames the talks as postwar security for Russia and Ukraine. That is the bucket where neutrality and military limits sit, and those demands date back to Istanbul in 2022 [13][23].
- U.S. leverage and cost-cutting
- Washington's main tools are aid, intelligence and sanctions. It has used both pressure and relief to move each side [9][10][11].
Material realityThe war goes on while the talks are being arranged. Early-2026 rounds did not narrow the core gaps [6][22]. Both sides say they will talk, but on Oct. 25 Kyiv said key Russian aims are off the table [3]. Moscow called the Oslo proposals short on 'real value' [7]. Where the talks are held is also not settled: Peskov named Abu Dhabi, while Ukrainian reporting lists other options [3][13].
Narrative as a weaponKyiv wants readers to see Ukraine as ready and Russia as the side that sets the pace. Moscow wants its security agenda accepted as the natural frame for the talks. The Trump administration wants the process to look productive and its support for Ukraine to look unchanged. Western news outlets mostly tell the story as U.S.-Ukraine friction. Chinese and Turkish state media make it look symmetric and procedural. None of these framings alone shows how far apart Kyiv and Moscow remain.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asUkraine's case starts from memory. It says it gave up security before and was invaded anyway. A small army and a neutral status, it argues, would leave it open to a third invasion. To Kyiv, its army is the only guarantee that cannot be withdrawn, so it plans to keep an active force of 800,000 if funding allows [4]. On land, Zelensky argues that only elected leaders can decide on a country's borders. That is why he will discuss land only at the leaders' level [3]. He also says Ukraine is ready to meet 'any day, even tomorrow,' so any delay comes from Moscow [1][2].
WhyKyiv wants to lock in Western support and security guarantees before making concessions. It also wants to show Washington that Ukraine is not the side blocking peace [1][15].
Impact on themUkraine depends on U.S. intelligence and air-defense interceptors. Zelensky said intelligence sharing was restored after Oslo, while Ukraine also accused the Pentagon of failing to deliver interceptors [11][16]. At home, conceding land or neutrality would be very hard to sell politically [3].
Frames it asMoscow says the war is about the security order on its border, not only about land. It says any lasting deal must answer Russia's concern about a Western-armed Ukraine. So it wants the talks to build 'a security system for Russia and Ukraine' after the war [6][13]. It notes that Ukraine discussed neutrality in exchange for guarantees in Istanbul in 2022 [23]. In its view, those terms are a realistic starting point and not a novel demand. Peskov also argues that a wider European security setup cannot be settled by three countries alone [13].
WhyRussia wants to get its core terms into the agenda. It also wants to keep up the U.S. sanctions relief it has received. Ushakov's lukewarm 'not fully satisfied' signals Moscow is not giving ground just to keep talks going [7][9].
Impact on themRussia gains from easier sanctions, such as relief on diesel exports [9]. If talks stall and Washington tightens pressure again, it risks more sanctions [12].
Frames it asThe White House argues that a long war of attrition helps no one. It says only a deal both sides accept will end the killing. On that view, talking to Moscow and pushing Kyiv are the job of a mediator, not taking sides. A U.S. official called Oslo 'very productive and constructive' and pointed to a framework covering security guarantees, a postwar economic plan and European security [16]. Rubio said U.S. support has not changed [10]. Trump has said he does not 'care how it's done' as long as the war ends [12].
WhyThe administration wants a deal it can present as ending the war. It also wants to cut open-ended U.S. costs [12][9].
Impact on themIts leverage runs through U.S. aid and sanctions policy. Easing sanctions on Russia and Kyiv's accusations of withheld support have strained ties with Ukraine and drawn criticism [9][10].
Frames it asEuropean partners argue that Europe's own security is at stake. In their view, any deal that changes Ukraine's military status shapes the threat on their borders. So Europe needs a seat at the table. Hosting the Oslo round put European leaders in the room with U.S. envoys [9][20].
WhyThey want to avoid a deal struck over their heads and to keep U.S. engagement in Ukraine [19][20].
Impact on themFinland shares a long border with Russia, and any settlement would set the terms of its own security environment. Peskov said European security 'architecture' cannot be decided without others [13].
Frames it asCritics in the U.S. come from two opposite directions. Supporters of Ukraine argue that pressing Kyiv while easing sanctions on Moscow rewards aggression. Their coverage stresses Kyiv's charges of withheld support [10]. Skeptics of aid on the right argue the war is Europe's problem. They say Americans 'just get the bill' [18].
WhyOne side wants more pressure on Russia. The other wants less U.S. spending.
Impact on themBoth shape how much room the White House has on aid and sanctions [9][18].
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 4.6
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune | U.S. center, business | 3 | Putin agrees 'in principle' to resume talks ... but still isn't 'fully satisfied' with proposals | Keeps the Kremlin's own hedges in the headline. That is fairly straight framing. |
| NBC News | U.S. center-left | 4 | Zelenskyy meets with Trump envoys as U.S. blasts 'scandalous' accusations about withdrawn support | Puts the U.S.-Ukraine dispute at the center and describes the U.S. campaign as 'allied with moves aimed at courting the Kremlin.' |
| CNBC | U.S. center | 4 | Zelenskyy to meet Witkoff in Norway as tensions with Trump rise | Frames the trip as conflict-driven and pairs it with the easing of sanctions on Russia. |
| CGTN | Chinese state | 4 | Russia, US, Ukraine signal plans for trilateral talks in November | Symmetric 'all three signal' framing that plays down Kyiv's red lines and the gap between the two sides. |
| Kyiv Post | Ukrainian, pro-Kyiv | 4 | Zelensky Sets 3 Red Lines for Peace: 800,000-Troop Army, No Neutrality, No Limits on Its Forces | Leads with Ukraine's conditions. Russia's agenda is mostly absent. |
| Al Jazeera | Qatari state-funded | 5 | 'I don't care how it's done': Trump pressures Ukraine to cut peace deal | A Trump quote leads the headline, which makes Washington's pressure on Kyiv the story. |
| Dissenter (Opinion) | U.S. fringe right | 8 | Zelensky Touts 'Positive Signals' From Oslo — Americans Just Get the Bill | Scare quotes and a cost-only framing. It ignores the substance of the talks. |
References
- Trilateral peace talks with Russia, US negotiators to begin in November, Zelensky says — Kyiv Independent · Ukrainian independent, pro-Kyiv, grant- and reader-funded
- Zelenskyy confirms trilateral Ukraine-US-Russia talks planned for early November — Ukrainska Pravda · Ukrainian independent, pro-Kyiv
- Zelenskyy sets out Ukraine's position on Armed Forces size, neutrality and territorial issues in peace talks — Ukrainska Pravda · Ukrainian independent, pro-Kyiv
- Zelensky Sets 3 Red Lines for Peace: 800,000-Troop Army, No Neutrality, No Limits on Its Forces — Kyiv Post · Ukrainian, privately owned, pro-Kyiv
- Ukraine's Zelenskyy confirms trilateral talks with Russia and US to take place in November — Euronews · European, center, partly EU-funded
- Putin agrees to resume trilateral Russia-Ukraine-U.S. talks next month — PBS NewsHour · U.S. public broadcaster, center
- Putin agrees 'in principle' to resume talks with Washington and Kyiv ... but still isn't 'fully satisfied' with proposals — Fortune · U.S. business press, center
- Putin Agrees to Resume Ukraine Peace Talks After Nov. 10 — WHSV (Gray Television) · U.S. local TV group, center
- Zelenskyy to meet Witkoff in Norway as tensions with Trump rise — CNBC · U.S. business news, center (Versant)
- Zelenskyy meets with Trump envoys as U.S. blasts 'scandalous' accusations about withdrawn support — NBC News · U.S. center-left commercial network (Comcast)
- U.S. restores intelligence sharing with Ukraine, Zelensky says — The Washington Post · U.S. center-left
- 'I don't care how it's done': Trump pressures Ukraine to cut peace deal — Al Jazeera · Qatari state-funded
- Russia, Ukraine trilateral peace talks scheduled for first half of November — Anadolu Agency · Turkish state-run
- Russia, US, Ukraine signal plans for trilateral talks in November — CGTN · Chinese state media
- Zelensky details expectations for upcoming trilateral peace talks with Russia, US — Kyiv Independent · Ukrainian independent, pro-Kyiv
- US envoy Steve Witkoff to meet Russians as Trump presses Kyiv to settle — ABC News (Australia) · Australian public broadcaster, center
- Nothing personal between me and Trump, Zelensky tells CNN — CNN · U.S. center-left
- Zelensky Touts 'Positive Signals' From Oslo — Americans Just Get the Bill — Dissenter · U.S. fringe right, opinion
- Zelenskyy Goes to Oslo for US Talks as Trump Tensions Mount — Bloomberg · U.S. business press, center
- Zelenskyy to hold talks on Russia-Ukraine war with Witkoff, Europeans — Al Jazeera · Qatari state-funded
- Ukraine war talks to resume 'in principle' after Putin signals agreement — NewsNation · U.S. center (Nexstar)
- 2026 United States–Ukraine–Russia meetings in Abu Dhabi — Wikipedia · Crowd-edited reference
- Ukraine-Russia talks in Istanbul (VOA, March 29, 2022) — Voice of America (via GlobalSecurity.org) · U.S. government-funded broadcaster