Coast Guard C-37A Carrying DHS Secretary Mullin Lands at Reagan National After Right Engine Fails
The 2002-vintage Gulfstream V, with 14 people aboard, declared an emergency about 1:30 p.m. on Sept. 2 and landed on one engine; no injuries were reported.
The Emergency Was Also the Design Working
At about 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, a U.S. Coast Guard pilot flying from Georgia to Washington, D.C., got on the radio to air traffic controllers at Reagan National Airport. "We just lost our right engine and would like to declare an emergency and immediate landing at DCA," he said, reporting 14 people on board and about two and a half hours of fuel left[1][2]. One of those 14 was Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin.
The plane, a Coast Guard C-37A tail-numbered C-101, landed safely on its one working engine. Fire and rescue crews from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority checked it over, and it taxied off the runway on its own power[2]. Nobody was hurt[1][2][4].
That is the entire undisputed record. What happened next is a case study in how the same set of facts gets read as two completely different stories, depending on which detail a newsroom puts first.
A Twin-Engine Jet Losing One Engine Is Not What It Sounds Like
The C-37A is the military name for a Gulfstream V, a twin-engine business jet. Losing an engine sounds like an emergency in the movie sense, but it is not the same as a small single-engine plane losing its only motor. Twin-engine jets are built and certified specifically to keep flying, and land safely, on one engine — and pilots train for exactly this scenario over and over[7].
That's the redundancy: it's baked into the design, not a lucky break. It's also why a pilot can call the landing "routine" without spinning anything. Mullin, who was returning from Georgia, posted on X that the crew "made the single engine landing feel routine" and that the pilots told him it was the first time they'd ever had to do it for real[3][5].
That same fact — the landing was safe because the plane was built to survive it — is also why the safe outcome tells you almost nothing about whether the plane itself was in good shape. A worn-out engine and a bird strike can produce the identical radio call. As of Friday, Sept. 4, no agency had said what caused the failure, and none had announced a formal investigation finding.
The Plane Is 24 Years Old, and the Coast Guard Already Knew It Needed Replacing
C-101 has been flying for the Coast Guard since May 2002[7]. That detail is where U.S. coverage split hardest. Fox News, the Washington Examiner and Western Journal built their stories around Mullin's praise for the crew, with the aircraft's age barely mentioned[3][6]. The Gateway Pundit went further, running the headline "Single-Engine Plane Carrying DHS Chief Markwayne Mullin Makes Emergency Landing" — a description that fits a small Cessna, not a twin-engine jet that had one engine fail and landed on the other[9].
The Washington Post, CNN and NBC News took the opposite approach. They led with the mechanical failure and the ATC audio, and put Mullin's reaction lower in the story, while noting the jet's age[1][4][8]. That ordering doesn't accuse anyone of anything. It just quietly raises the question of whether a 24-year-old jet should still be flying a cabinet secretary.
The Coast Guard has been making exactly that argument itself, for budget purposes, for years. Its official case for replacing these jets points to rising maintenance problems and canceled missions on aircraft around 20 years old — in other words, an availability problem, not just a safety scare[15]. The service had already started swapping the fleet out before this flight ever happened, taking delivery of its first new jet in January 2026[14].
A $172 Million Contract, Awarded With No Competing Bids, During a Shutdown
In October 2025, while the federal government was in a shutdown, the Coast Guard awarded Gulfstream Aerospace a contract worth about $172 million for two new G700 jets to replace aircraft like C-101[12][13]. The deal was sole-source, meaning the Coast Guard didn't put it out for competitive bidding among multiple companies. Normally that competition is what keeps a price honest and makes sure the government isn't just picking a favorite vendor.
The Coast Guard's own written justification, filed under a federal rule that allows sole-source deals in specific circumstances, says Gulfstream was "the only vendor capable of acquiring G700s under a secure, strict, and time-sensitive process." The jets need a particular secure communications setup, and the timeline didn't leave room for a normal competitive process, according to that filing. That's the government's on-the-record defense of skipping the bidding process — a detail largely missing from stories that framed the purchase as simply drawing scrutiny[12][13].
Critics, including the aviation site Simple Flying, still argue the timing and structure of the deal look bad on their face: no competition, during a shutdown, for a jet that ended up flying the secretary's personal travel almost as soon as it arrived[13][14]. Simple Flying's own October 2025 headline, "Despite Government Shutdown DHS Spends $172M On Gulfstream G700," put that judgment in the first line, before the Coast Guard's readiness rationale even appeared in the story[13].
Two Camps, Reading the Same Engine Failure in Opposite Directions
This is where the engine failure lands, almost perfectly, in the middle of an argument that was already happening. For the Coast Guard and the administration, the failure is proof the old jets genuinely needed replacing — the $172 million purchase looks less like a luxury and more like a fix that was already overdue. For critics of that spending, the failure cuts the other way: it shows the government waited too long, and it keeps the sole-source contract in the news right as the second replacement jet is due[13].
Mullin himself has an obvious interest in the story being about the crew's skill rather than the plane's age. He leads a department CNN described at his March 2026 confirmation as being "in turmoil"[10]. A story where his people perform flawlessly under pressure costs him nothing and helps him some.
The Coast Guard, notably, has said almost nothing publicly about the engine failure itself. That's consistent with an agency that already has the budget outcome it wants — a second G700 on the way — and doesn't gain much from reopening a public debate about why the old engine quit.
What's Still Open
Nobody disputes what happened on the runway. Fourteen people, including a cabinet secretary, landed safely because a decades-old design worked the way it was supposed to. What's disputed is what the moment proves.
Right now, that argument is running well ahead of the facts. No agency has said what caused the failure, and no formal finding has been made public as of Sept. 4. A bird strike and a tired engine would sound identical over the radio — and until investigators say which one this was, both sides get to keep reading the same emergency landing as evidence for their own case.
Summary
A U.S. Coast Guard jet carrying Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin lost its right engine in flight on Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, and landed safely at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport[1][2]. Fourteen people were on board, including Mullin[2]. The pilot declared an emergency with air traffic control around 1:30 p.m. and asked for an immediate landing[1]. No one was hurt. Airport fire and rescue crews checked the plane, and it taxied off the runway under its own power[2].
The aircraft was a C-37A, the military version of the Gulfstream V business jet. The Coast Guard calls this particular plane C-101. It has flown for the service since May 2002 — about 24 years[7]. A twin-engine jet like the Gulfstream V is designed and certified to fly and land on one engine, and pilots train for it. Mullin, who was returning from Georgia, wrote on X that the crew "made the single engine landing feel routine" and that the pilots told him it was a first for them[3][5].
There is no real dispute about what happened. The dispute is about what it means. Supporters of the administration point to the outcome: the training and the equipment worked, and everyone walked away. Critics and some aviation-trade reporters point to the age of the plane. The Coast Guard has said for years that its older command-and-control jets were racking up maintenance problems and canceled missions[15]. In October 2025 — during a federal government shutdown — the service awarded Gulfstream a sole-source contract worth about $172 million for two new G700 jets to replace them[12][13]. That purchase drew criticism at the time as a luxury buy for cabinet travel[13]. The engine failure hands each camp a use for the same facts: one side says it shows why the new planes were needed, the other says it shows what a $172 million VIP jet purchase was actually funding.
As of Friday, Sept. 4, no cause for the engine failure had been made public, and no agency had announced a formal investigation finding.
The Event
On Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, a U.S. Coast Guard C-37A jet, tail identifier C-101, lost its right engine while flying from Georgia to Washington, D.C.[3][5]. At about 1:30 p.m., the pilot told controllers at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport: "We just lost our right engine and would like to declare an emergency and immediate landing at DCA," and reported 14 people on board with about two and a half hours of fuel remaining[1][2]. The plane landed safely on its remaining engine. The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority said fire and rescue personnel checked the aircraft, which then taxied clear of the runway[2]. No injuries were reported[1][2].
Undisputed Facts
- Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin was aboard the aircraft, along with 13 other people, for a total of 14[1][2].
- The pilot declared an in-flight emergency after the right engine failed and requested an immediate landing at Reagan National[1][2].
- The aircraft is a C-37A, the military designation for a Gulfstream V, and it entered Coast Guard service in May 2002[7].
- The plane landed safely, was inspected by airport fire and rescue crews, and taxied off the runway[2].
- No injuries were reported[1][2][4].
- Mullin posted on X that the pilots "made the single engine landing feel routine" and told him it was their first such landing[3][5].
- Mullin was confirmed as DHS secretary by the Senate on a 54-45 vote in March 2026, replacing Kristi Noem[10][11].
- In October 2025 the Coast Guard awarded Gulfstream Aerospace a sole-source contract of about $172 million for two G700 command-and-control jets, and received the first on Jan. 29, 2026[12][14].
The Pressure
Strip away the moralizing and blame. What structural realities persist regardless of which narrative wins?
- Redundancy is the design, not the miracle
- Twin-engine jets are certified to keep flying and to land after losing one engine, and crews train for it repeatedly. That is why the outcome here was safe and why a pilot can call it "routine" without spin. It also means the safe landing is weak evidence about the health of the airframe either way[7].
- An aging fleet is a budget argument before it is a safety story
- The Coast Guard's recapitalization case rested on maintenance costs and canceled missions on aircraft roughly 20 years old — an availability problem[15]. The service was already replacing these jets before this flight, having taken the first G700 in January 2026[14]. Any single failure gets absorbed into that pre-existing argument.
- Sole-source procurement during a funding lapse invites scrutiny — but the government's justification is on the record too
- The roughly $172 million Gulfstream award was made without competition in October 2025, while the federal government was shut down[12][13]. A sole-source contract skips competitive bidding, which critics say removes a normal check on price and vendor selection. The Coast Guard's own posted justification, filed under Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1, states that "Gulfstream (as the OEM) is the only vendor capable of acquiring G700s under a secure, strict, and time-sensitive process," citing the need for a specific secure communications configuration and a compressed delivery timeline that ruled out a competitive process. That combination — no bidding, bad timing, VIP-capable aircraft, but a documented sole-qualified-vendor rationale — is why the purchase drew both congressional oversight letters and a formal defense from the agency.
- Cabinet-level travel is inherently a security question
- The DHS secretary is in the presidential line of succession and travels on aircraft with secure voice and data links[15]. That is the reason these are classed as command-and-control aircraft rather than transport, and it is also why the comfort-versus-necessity line is genuinely hard to draw from the outside.
Material realityOne of the Coast Guard's two older long-range command jets suffered an engine failure and is out of service pending inspection and repair. Fourteen people landed unhurt. The aircraft is 24 years old and was already scheduled for replacement; the second of two G700 replacements was expected by the end of fiscal 2026[14][15]. No agency has publicly stated a cause, and none had announced a formal investigation finding as of Sept. 4, 2026. Until a cause is known, the incident supports no firm conclusion about either fleet decay or fleet adequacy — a bird strike and a worn-out engine produce the same ATC transmission.
Narrative as a weaponThree actors are shaping this. Mullin moved first and fastest, posting his own account within hours; he wants you to see a well-run department whose people perform under pressure, and to remember the pilots rather than the plane. Right-leaning outlets amplified that version largely intact, with the fringe end inflating the danger to make the composure more impressive. Left-leaning outlets did not attack Mullin — they simply reordered the facts, putting the failure and the airframe's age up front, which invites the reader to ask about equipment without the outlet having to make the claim. The Coast Guard itself has said almost nothing publicly about the engine failure, though it did file a public justification for the sole-source purchase months earlier, which is consistent with an institution that already has the budget outcome it wants and gains little from a fresh debate about why the engine quit. The most useful thing a reader can hold onto is that the cause is unknown, and that every strong interpretation currently on offer is running ahead of it.
How Each Side Sees It
Each major actor’s view — how it frames things, its underlying incentive, and how it’s materially affected. Tap a side to read it.
Frames it asThe system worked exactly as designed. A twin-engine jet is built so that losing one engine is a survivable, trained-for event, not a catastrophe — that redundancy is the whole point of the design. The crew followed the procedure, declared the emergency, and put the plane down without injury. Mullin's public message put the credit on the Coast Guard aviators, not on himself[3][5]. In this telling, the story is a demonstration of professionalism inside a service the administration says it has been working to rebuild.
WhyMullin leads a department that CNN described at his confirmation as "in turmoil"[10]. A story in which his people perform flawlessly under pressure is useful to him and costs nothing. He also has an institutional interest in not letting the incident become a referendum on DHS equipment or spending.
Impact on themMullin was physically at risk and was not hurt[1]. Politically the episode has so far been net positive for him: coverage across the spectrum quoted his praise of the crew, and no outlet reported any decision or error on his part[3][5][6].
Frames it asThe service has argued for years that its long-range command-and-control jets were aging out. The Coast Guard's own recapitalization case cited rising maintenance problems and canceled missions on aircraft up to about 20 years old[15]. Its best argument is mechanical, not political: an airframe flown hard for two decades needs more unscheduled maintenance, and unscheduled maintenance on a jet that must be ready to fly a national-security mission on short notice is a readiness problem, not a comfort problem. The service began replacing the fleet before this flight, taking the first G700 in January 2026[14].
WhyThe Coast Guard wants the second G700 delivered and wants Congress to keep funding aviation recapitalization. An engine failure on a 24-year-old jet is, from a budget-justification standpoint, evidence for the case it was already making.
Impact on themOne of only two long-range command jets of that type is now out of service pending repair. The service told reporters nothing about cause as of publication. Its FY2027 budget request continues legacy-asset recapitalization[15].
Frames it asTheir case is about priorities and timing, not about whether new jets are ever justified. The $172 million Gulfstream contract was signed in October 2025, during a federal government shutdown, on a sole-source basis — meaning no competitive bidding[12][13]. The first delivered aircraft was promptly used for the secretary's own travel[14]. Critics argue that a purchase framed to Congress as mission readiness functions in practice as a cabinet-level executive shuttle, and that the label "command and control" does real work in making a VIP aircraft fundable.
WhyOversight-minded members of Congress and outside spending watchdogs want procurement leverage: sole-source awards during a funding lapse are exactly the kind of transaction they want subject to review.
Impact on themThe engine failure cuts both ways for them. It strengthens the argument that the old plane genuinely needed replacing, which weakens the "luxury purchase" charge. It also keeps the $172 million contract in the news[13].
Frames it asThis group treats the story as data, not politics. Their point is that an engine failure on approach to Reagan National is a routine-but-serious event handled under an established procedure, and that the meaningful question is the cause — a bird strike, a fuel issue, or a mechanical failure inside the engine are very different findings. They also note the setting: Reagan National is a congested, short-runway airport where any declared emergency ripples through the schedule. They caution against reading a single failure as proof of fleet-wide decay, because one engine failure is not a trend line.
WhyTrade outlets such as Flying and The War Zone build credibility on technical accuracy and are quick to correct sloppy descriptions — for instance, the difference between a single-engine airplane and a twin flying on one engine[7][14].
Impact on themTheir reporting is the main public source for what the aircraft actually is and how old it is[7][15]. If a formal investigation is opened, they will likely report the finding before general-interest outlets do.
Like this article?
The Bias Ledger average rating 3.3
The same story, as framed by outlets across the spectrum, ordered least to most biased. The bias score (1 = straight, 10 = heavily spun) is an AI assessment of that framing — click an outlet to see its track record. The tell is the word choice or omission that reveals the angle.
| Outlet | Vantage | Bias | How they frame it | The tell |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBS News | U.S. center | 2 | "Coast Guard plane carrying Markwayne Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure" — leads with the ATC audio and the airport authority's statement. | Minimal framing. Notes the plane's age and quotes the official statement in full rather than paraphrasing it. Little context on the fleet-spending fight, which keeps the story small. |
| The Washington Post | U.S. left-of-center | 2 | "Plane carrying DHS Secretary Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure" — mechanical failure first, official's reaction later. | Ordering is the tell. Putting the failure ahead of the safe outcome and noting the aircraft's age quietly raises the readiness question without asserting it. |
| Flying | U.S. aviation trade press | 2 | "DHS Secretary Lauds Pilots of Coast Guard C-37A After Emergency Landing" — identifies the exact airframe and its 2002 service entry. | Technical framing. Supplies the fleet detail general outlets skip, including the newer C-37B and the aging C-37A's avionics problems — useful, but a trade outlet's readers are also the industry that sells replacements. |
| Fox News | U.S. right | 3 | "Coast Guard plane with DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin on board makes emergency landing after engine failure" — factual headline, body built around Mullin's praise for the crew. | Mullin's own quote does most of the narrative work. The aircraft's 24-year age and the $172 million replacement contract are not the frame, so the reader gets competence without the equipment question. |
| Washington Examiner | U.S. right | 3 | "Coast Guard jet carrying DHS chief makes emergency landing" — brief, incident-only treatment. | Compresses the story to the event and the safe landing. Omitting the procurement backdrop is a choice that keeps a spending controversy out of a story that touches it. |
| Simple Flying | U.S./U.K. aviation trade, consumer-facing | 5 | "Despite Government Shutdown DHS Spends $172M On Gulfstream G700" — from October 2025, the piece that framed the replacement buy as questionable timing. | "Despite Government Shutdown" front-loads the judgment. The mission-readiness rationale the Coast Guard gave appears further down, so the spending looks discretionary by construction. |
| The Gateway Pundit | U.S. right, pro-Trump advocacy | 6 | "Single-Engine Plane Carrying DHS Chief Markwayne Mullin Makes Emergency Landing After Suffering Engine Failure." | "Single-Engine Plane" is factually wrong and self-contradicting — a Gulfstream V has two engines; it landed on one. The error inflates the peril, and the drama is the product. |
References
- Plane carrying DHS Secretary Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure — The Washington Post · U.S. left-of-center national daily; owned by Jeff Bezos
- Coast Guard plane carrying Markwayne Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure — CBS News · U.S. center; commercial broadcast network owned by Paramount Skydance
- Coast Guard plane with DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin on board makes emergency landing after engine failure — Fox News · U.S. right-leaning; owned by Fox Corporation
- Homeland Security secretary's Coast Guard plane makes emergency landing — CNN · U.S. center-left cable network; owned by Warner Bros. Discovery
- DHS Secretary Mullin's plane made emergency landing after engine failure — The Hill · U.S. center; Washington political trade publication owned by Nexstar
- Coast Guard jet carrying DHS chief makes emergency landing — Washington Examiner · U.S. right; funded by conservative donor Philip Anschutz
- DHS Secretary Lauds Pilots of Coast Guard C-37A After Emergency Landing — Flying · U.S. aviation trade magazine; audience is pilots and the aviation industry
- Coast Guard plane carrying DHS secretary makes emergency landing after engine failure — NBC News · U.S. center-left broadcast network owned by Comcast/NBCUniversal
- Single-Engine Plane Carrying DHS Chief Markwayne Mullin Makes Emergency Landing After Suffering Engine Failure — The Gateway Pundit · U.S. pro-Trump advocacy site with a documented record of factual errors
- Markwayne Mullin confirmed to lead a DHS in turmoil — CNN · U.S. center-left cable network
- U.S. Senate Confirms Markwayne Mullin as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security — U.S. Department of Homeland Security · U.S. federal government; the agency Mullin leads — an interested primary source
- Coast Guard Awards GD's Gulfstream Unit $172 Million For Command And Control Aircraft — Defense Daily · U.S. defense-industry trade newsletter; subscriber base is contractors and government buyers
- Despite Government Shutdown DHS Spends $172M On Gulfstream G700 — Simple Flying · Consumer-facing aviation news site; traffic-driven, headline-forward
- Department Of Homeland Security's New Gulfstream Jet Now In Service — The War Zone · U.S. defense and military-aviation trade outlet
- Coast Guard recapitalizes command and control aircraft — U.S. Coast Guard · U.S. federal government; the service making the budget case — an interested primary source